· Public charity
Heartland Regional Medical Center
To put the needs of the patient first by empowering a culture where caregivers bring their best, ensuring a healthier future for generations to come.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $2,316,972 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,773,892 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $456,920 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $245k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+2 grants · $676k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Heartland Foundation | $421,116 |
| YMCA of St Joseph Missouri | $255,000 |
| Samaritan Counseling Center Inc | $210,000 |
| United Way of Greater St Joseph | $152,380 |
| Second Harvest Community Food Bank | $150,500 |
| Social Welfare Board | $150,000 |
| YWCA of St Joseph Missouri | $102,400 |
| North Central Missouri College Foundation | $100,000 |
| St Joseph Area Chamber of Commerce | $97,075 |
| Community Missions Corporation | $61,715 |
| Albrecht-Kemper Museum of Art Foundations | $60,500 |
| Ashland United Methodist Church | $58,300 |
| Northwest Missouri Childrens Advocacy Center | $56,500 |
| Habitat for Humanity | $53,000 |
| St Joseph Housing Corp | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $259k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHeartland Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $7.1M · revenue +367% · 55% of their budget
- MWMISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +53%
- UWUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH7× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +2%
Funded once
- MMMosaic Medical Center Maryvillegraduatedone grant, 2019 · $26M · revenue +156% · 66% of their budget
- MHMosaic Health Systemgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $18M · revenue +235% · 100% of their budget
- NMNorthwest Medical Center Association Incone grant, 2019 · $6.7M · revenue +12% · 27% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri
Educate the community on workers' rights
To put the needs of the patient first by empowering a culture where caregivers bring their best, ensuring a healthier future for generations to come.
The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
Center for patient safety seeks to reduce preventable patient harm by improving patient safety culture, working in collaboration with providers, associations and government entities.
The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…
The mission of stl care company is to improve public health services designed to prevent and reduce sickness, produce positive health, provide quality nursing home care, encourage proactive use of health and medical resources, acquire…
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
An association providing community leadership and business advocacy sustaining economic vitality.
Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.
To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 27. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mosaic Medical Center Maryville ↗
- Who funds Mosaic Health System ↗
- Who funds Heartland Foundation ↗
- Who funds Northwest Medical Center Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds THE CROSSING OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MISSIONS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid of Western Missouri ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY - ST JOSEPH INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MISSOURI CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER ST JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds MIDCITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds BARTLETT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Ladies Union Benevolent Association ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PHYSICIANS HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater St Joseph · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Moya Family Foundation · Helen N Poston Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heartland Regional Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.