Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helen N Poston Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$302kFood & Nutrition$109kPhilanthropy$87kAnimals$86kYouth Development$82kEmployment$75kArts & Culture$63kHousing & Shelter$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$20,000
PONY EXPRESS COUNCIL BSA$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$10,000
AFL-CIO NWMO UNITED LABOR COMMUNITY SERV$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KS NW MO$7,500
ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH$4,500
PONY EXPRESS NATIONAL MUSEUM$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 18%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS -: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 18%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $15k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$735k · 26 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$735k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-17%

Still filing today

42%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2017–2021 · $15k · revenue +46%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN
    3× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -17%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST COMM FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • NU
    NWMO UNITED LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
8
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
9
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

10
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
11
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Community Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Open Door Community Food Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PONY EXPRESS COUNCIL BSA — $86,000 · OtherPONY EXPRESS COUNCIL BSASECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $70,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANKINTERSERV — $60,000 · OtherINTERSERVSALVATION ARMY — $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYInterfaith Community Services — $50,000 · OtherInterfaith Community ServicesTHE SALVATION ARMY — $45,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSALVATION ARMY OF ST JOSEPH — $35,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KS NW MO — $29,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-ST JOSEPH — $27,000 · OtherST JOSEPH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,000 · Other+27 more — $245,911 · Other+27 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH — $35,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $30,000 · PhilanthropyALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI — $34,500 · Arts & CulturePONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$723,411Philanthropy$65,000Arts & Culture$41,500Human Services$30,000Youth Development$19,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetInterfaith Community Services — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH — $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI — $34,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $25,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN — $15,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBARTLETT CENTER — $14,750 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetPONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH
  • Who funds ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BARTLETT CENTER
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold P Dugdale Charitable TrustMN22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helen N Poston Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph