Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Kansas · Nonprofit

Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park

Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park (Kansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $230,548 to it, the largest being BREIDENTHAL-SNYDER FOUNDATION INC ($163,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$251k
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$231k
Grants received
$470k
Net assets
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%

Against its field

Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−32% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,424 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($237k) Expenses 100 ($172k) Net assets 100 ($352k)2018 Revenue 85 ($200k) Expenses 100 ($172k) Net assets 108 ($381k)2019 Revenue 121 ($288k) Expenses 149 ($257k) Net assets 117 ($412k)2020 Revenue 116 ($274k) Expenses 129 ($222k) Net assets 132 ($464k)2021 Revenue 98 ($232k) Expenses 142 ($245k) Net assets 128 ($452k)2022 Revenue 130 ($307k) Expenses 110 ($190k) Net assets 162 ($569k)2023 Revenue 83 ($198k) Expenses 124 ($213k) Net assets 157 ($553k)2024 Revenue 106 ($251k) Expenses 192 ($331k) Net assets 133 ($470k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (106)Expenses (192)Net assets (133)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

62% of Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,013 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$65k
17
$29k
18
$31k
19
$52k
20
$12k
21
$117k
22
$16k
23
$79k
24
4.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $14k → $31k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

71%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 52% · 2020 58% · 2021 92% · 2022 99% · 2023 83%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

99% of Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park's grant income comes from Kansas funders.

WI
DE
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Kansas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 259 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Kansas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

KS

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park?
Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park (Kansas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $230,548 to it, the largest being BREIDENTHAL-SNYDER FOUNDATION INC ($163,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $230,548 in grants to Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park?
BREIDENTHAL-SNYDER FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $163,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Cedar Cove Feline Conservation Park find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kansas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing