Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wittnam Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$328kPhilanthropy$20kRecreation & Sports$17kInternational$9kHealth$9kCrime & Legal$6kFood & Nutrition$4kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$2,062
Median grant
7
States reached
$133k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY$33,350
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$12,000
ENTRUST$4,700
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL$3,400
NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION$3,000
RESTORATION PROJECT$2,400
FRONTIERS$2,400
SIM USA$2,400
Individual grant recipient$2,062
GENEISIS PROJECT$1,200
NOVO MISSION INC$1,200
THE RESOURCE CENTER$1,200
CHRISTIAN CHALLENGE$1,100
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$1,032
JOBS OF HOPE INC$900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NOVO MISSION INC: $2k → 10%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 13%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12k → 8%SIM USA: $2k → 10%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY: $72k → 9%GENESIS PROJECT OF NORTHERN CO: $1k → 11%RESOURCING CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INTERNATONAL: $1k → 7%UNITED WAY: $1k → 9%CHRISTIAN CHALLENGE: $1k → 19%NOVO MISSION INC: $1k → 10%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 13%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 8%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY: $38k → 9%GENEISIS PROJECT: $1k → 11%NOVO MISSION INC: $1k → 10%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 13%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY: $33k → 9%RESTORATION PROJECT: $2k → 11%NOVO MISSION INC: $1k → 10%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 13%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY: $32k → 9%NOVO MISSION INC: $900 → 10%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY: $31k → 9%THE RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%THE RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 9%THE RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 9%THE RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 9%WELD COUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%THE RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 9%WELD COUNTY FOOD BANK: $950 → 9%WELD COUNTY FOOD BANK: $900 → 9%ENTRUST: $5k → 9%ENTRUST: $4k → 9%ENTRUST: $4k → 9%ELSHADAI CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 9%ELSHADAI CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 9%ELSHADAI CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 9%ELSHADAI CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 9%ELSHADAI CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 9%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 9%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 9%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 9%COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$383k · 20 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
11

Total granted

$383k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

40%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthInternationalEmploymentPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JO
    JOBS OF HOPE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +55%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • WF
    WELD FOOD BANK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • GP
    GENESIS PROJECT OF NORTHERN CO
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • RC
    Resourcing Christian Education International
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -15%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
3
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

4
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

6
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

9
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

10
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
11
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
12
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Entrust and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEY — $205,906 · OtherCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF GREELEYFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $17,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESENTRUST — $13,100 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · Other+17 more — $36,018 · Other+17 moreMIO Frontiers — $74,227 · ReligionMIO FrontiersJFM NETWORK INC — $4,200 · ReligionRESTORATION PROJECT — $3,000 · Religion+2 more — $2,450 · ReligionThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $15,650 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH — $7,250 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthJOBS OF HOPE INC — $6,100 · EmploymentCompassion International Incorporated — $4,912 · International+1 more — $100 · InternationalWELD FOOD BANK — $3,850 · Food & Nutrition
Other$282,024Religion$83,877Philanthropy$17,650Health$7,350Employment$6,100International$5,012Food & Nutrition$3,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIO Frontiers — $74,227 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $15,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENTRUST — $13,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH — $7,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJOBS OF HOPE INC — $6,100 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetJFM NETWORK INC — $4,200 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK — $3,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORATION PROJECT — $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetResourcing Christian Education International — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDayspring Christian Academy — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTS INTERNATIONAL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIO Frontiers
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ENTRUST
  • Who funds THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH
  • Who funds JOBS OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds JFM NETWORK INC
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK
  • Who funds RESTORATION PROJECT
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Resourcing Christian Education International
  • Who funds GREELEY AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds Dayspring Christian Academy
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Weld TrustCO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Weld Trust · Colorado Gives Foundation · United Way of Weld County Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wittnam Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph