Skip to content

· Private foundation

Winiarski Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$38M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$54MHealth$6.2MArts & Culture$3.8MHuman Services$723kEnvironment$550kPublic Benefit$448kFood & Nutrition$325kReligion$227kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,121,614
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHNS COLLEGE$37,500,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$3,121,614
UC DAVIS FOUNDATION$2,446,087
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $406k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 9%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%ALDEA: $25k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $20k → 9%ALDEA: $20k → 9%ALDEA: $20k → 9%ALDEA: $20k → 9%ALDEA: $20k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $10k → 9%ALDEA: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $10k → 9%ALDEA: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $2k → 9%NEWS: $35k → 9%NEWS: $35k → 9%NEWS: $35k → 9%NEWS: $25k → 9%NEWS: $25k → 9%NEWS: $25k → 9%NEWS: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66M · 55 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
22

Total granted

$66M
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+27%

Still filing today

65%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +31%
  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +66%
  • University of Chicago
    6× · 2017–2022 · $390k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PATHWAY HOME INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -100%
  • INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -21%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
2
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
5
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
6
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
9
National University

To deliver accessible world-class student experiences by providing quality programs and services that ensure student success through meaningful learning. to be an inclusive and innovative university serving life-long learners who…

Education
10
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Napa Valley College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bayanihan Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
40/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHNS COLLEGE IN SANTA FE: $50,080,000 · OtherST JOHNS COLLEGE IN SANTA FE+42 more: $2,008,850 · OtherQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,680,000 · HealthQUEEN OF T…OLE HEALTH: $375,000 · HealthOLE HEALTH+5 more: $180,500 · HealthSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $3,439,114 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $229,500 · Arts & CultureTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $2,840,701 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $390,000 · EducationTHE NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $160,000 · EducationCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,001 · Education+3 more: $110,000 · EducationNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST: $225,000 · EnvironmentSAVE NAPA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentMARTHA'S VINEYARD FISHERMEN'S PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $20,000 · Environment+1 more: $7,500 · EnvironmentNEWS: $195,000 · Human ServicesALDEA INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $52,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $8,900 · Human ServicesMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $75,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $61,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$52,088,850Health$6,235,500Arts & Culture$3,668,614Education$3,650,702Environment$512,500Human Services$405,900Public Benefit$161,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,680,000 over 7y, 37% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $3,439,114 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $2,840,701 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $390,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOLE HEALTH: $375,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST: $225,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSAVE NAPA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 37% of budgetNEWS: $195,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $175,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,001 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetALDEA INC: $125,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTRINITY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $110,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNAPA VALLEY MUSEUM: $107,500 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetHANDS ACROSS THE VALLEY INC GEORGE ALTAMURA SR: $100,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetTHE PATHWAY HOME INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCope Family Center: $95,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPacific Research Institute For Public Policy: $80,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $61,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLANE TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetDAMIAN MALDONADO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 45% of budgetNAPA VALLEY WINE LIBRARY ASSOCIATIO: $60,000 over 5y, 46% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $55,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $52,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIF GIVEN A CHANCE: $42,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Rescue Center of Napa County Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRUSH MS: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD FISHERMEN'S PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHAITIAN EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMARK DAY SCHOOL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING IT FORWARD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $8,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPA HIGH CHORAL BOOSTERS: $8,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNOLLY RANCH EDUCATION CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR BETTER LIVING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKQED INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNIMBUS ARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds OLE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SAVE NAPA VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWS ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗
  • Who funds THE NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALDEA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ACROSS THE VALLEY INC GEORGE ALTAMURA SR ↗
  • Who funds THE PATHWAY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Cope Family Center ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Research Institute For Public Policy ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds LANE TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAMIAN MALDONADO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY WINE LIBRARY ASSOCIATIO ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IF GIVEN A CHANCE ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA40.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Vollmer Family Foundation · Queen of the Valley Medical Center · Community Projects Inc · The David Butler Family Foundation · The Woods Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Winiarski Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Winiarski Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Winiarski Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Winiarski Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winiarski Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph