Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of SYAR FOUNDATION SUSAN L SYAR DIRECTOR’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $661k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $133k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST 5 SOLANO (CHILD START INC)$1,000,000
ACCESS ADVENTURE$82,500
VACAVILLE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$50,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$45,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
VIA HEART PROJECT (NAPA POLICE DEPARTMENT)$37,650
SHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
VOENA$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SPIRITHORSE RIDING CENTER$25,000
HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA$25,000
NAPA EMERGENCY WOMEN'S SERVICES (NEWS)$25,000
COPE FAMILY CENTER$25,000
LA LUZ CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $521k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UP VALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $25k → 9%Creres Community Project: $15k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%SUMMER HOUSE INC: $20k → 16%B WALKER RANCH: $25k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%B WALKER RANCH: $19k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $15k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%B Walker Ranch: $10k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5k → 9%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY INC: $20k → 16%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $20k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $25k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $5k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $45k → 9%THE ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%WATCH ME GROW INC: $10k → 10%NAPA VALLEY SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 9%SHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY: $35k → 9%SHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY: $22k → 9%NAPA EMERGENCY WOMEN'S SERVICES: $20k → 9%SHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY: $20k → 9%NAPA EMERGENCY WOMEN'S SERVICES: $20k → 9%Napa Emergency Women's Serv: $20k → 9%CHILDRENS NETWORK OF SOLANO COUNTY: $20k → 10%CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF SOLANO COUNTY: $20k → 10%Children's Network of Solano County: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 66 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

66 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
42

Total granted

$3.7M
$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+3%

Still filing today

58%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Cope Family Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $210k · revenue +29%
  • TV
    THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    4× · 2019–2024 · $165k · revenue +144%
  • YF
    YOLO FOOD BANK
    4× · 2019–2023 · $155k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SE
    SOLANO EDC (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP)
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SS
    SUTTER SOLANO MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SA
    SUISUN AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +7% · 28% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights
2
Sonoma Botanical Garden
3
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
4
Sonoma Valley Health & Recreation Association

Sonoma Valley Health and recreation Association (Sonoma Splash) is dedicated to providing a sustainable state of the art multi-use aquatic and recreation facility accessible to all Sonoma Valley residents for aquatic education and safety,…

Recreation & Sports
5
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
Housing & Shelter
6
Solano Family & Childrens Council Inc

Solano Family & Children's Services promotes and advocates for the well-being of children, their families, and child care providers by offering access to a variety of child care resources.

Human Services
7
Homes for California Dba Homes for Sonoma

Homes for Sonoma is a nonprofit developer creating quality workforce housing options that support safe and sustainable community, and finds efficient, scalable solutions to address the housing crisis in Sonoma County and throughout…

Housing & Shelter
8
Puertas Abiertas Community Resource Center

Puertas Abiertas is a trusted home and advocate that strengthens the Latino Community through multicultural programs and services.

Health
9
Nami Sonoma County

NAMI Sonoma County's mission is to build better lives for individuals and families affected by mental illness throughout Sonoma County by providing education, support, and advocacy.

10
Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition

Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition is a 501c3 Non-Profit and Physician Lead Harm Reduction Program. Our program provides life saving Naloxone, Overdose Reversal Training, Safe Use Supplies, Syringe Disposal, HIV/HCV Testing, Drug…

Education
11
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Bay Area Barns and Trails
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter Solano Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr13%10%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr20%26%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr13%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr13%11%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr20%30%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr13%16%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/70
the rest of the field
13%
815/6,470

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/66
Grantees still filing
41/66
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST 5 SOLANO (CHILD START INC) — $1,000,000 · OtherFIRST 5 SOLANO (CHILD START INC)BOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY — $151,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $165,000 · Other+81 more — $2,143,410 · Other+81 moreShare the Care Napa Valley — $76,500 · Human ServicesShare the C…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMP…NEWS — $60,000 · Human ServicesNEWSB WALKER RANCH — $54,000 · Human ServicesB WALKER RA…Childrens Network of Solano County — $50,000 · Human ServicesChildrens N…THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES C…Wayfinder Family Services — $35,000 · Human ServicesWayfinder F…LA LUZ CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENT…UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $25,000 · Human ServicesSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesSUMMER HOUSE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesYolo Crisis Nursery — $20,000 · Human Services+2 more — $20,125 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $80,000 · HealthSQUARE PEG FOUNDATION — $55,000 · HealthSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS — $50,000 · HealthBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $47,520 · HealthHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY — $25,000 · HealthVIA HEART PROJECT — $25,000 · HealthALS Network — $25,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association — $15,000 · Health+1 more — $6,000 · HealthVOENA — $175,000 · Arts & CultureHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNapa Valley Youth Symphony — $20,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG ARTISTS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureDOWNTOWN THEATER FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureYOLO FOOD BANK — $155,000 · Food & NutritionHANDS ACROSS THE VALLEY INC GEORGE ALTAMURA SR — $41,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $40,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING IT FORWARD INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCope Family Center — $210,000 · Crime & LegalACCESS ADVENTURE — $183,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,609,910Human Services$550,625Health$328,520Arts & Culture$250,000Food & Nutrition$246,000Crime & Legal$210,000Public Benefit$183,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCope Family Center — $210,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetACCESS ADVENTURE — $183,000 over 8y, 97% of budgetVOENA — $175,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $165,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK — $155,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY — $151,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSOLANO COALITION FOR BETTER HEALTH — $100,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $80,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCommunity Resources for Children — $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetShare the Care Napa Valley — $76,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetCASA of Solano County — $60,250 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetHEALTHY VALLEJO COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $60,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetNEWS — $60,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSQUARE PEG FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetB WALKER RANCH — $54,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetCenter for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership — $53,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetChildrens Network of Solano County — $50,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC — $47,520 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $45,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHANDS ACROSS THE VALLEY INC GEORGE ALTAMURA SR — $41,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWayfinder Family Services — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIM AND JEANNIE HAMANN FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetHEALDSBURG EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSHELTER SOLANO INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSUISUN AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE — $25,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetALS Network — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SOLANO COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetNapa Valley Youth Symphony — $20,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetYOLO COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES — $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ROBBY POBLETE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetSUMMER HOUSE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Loma Vista Farm — $20,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSafeQuest Solano Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWe Care Animal Rescue Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSAVING GRACIE INC — $11,050 over 2y, 12% of budgetNAPA VALLEY SUPPORT SERVICES — $10,125 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cope Family Center
  • Who funds ACCESS ADVENTURE
  • Who funds VOENA
  • Who funds THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
  • Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY
  • Who funds SOLANO COALITION FOR BETTER HEALTH
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Community Resources for Children
  • Who funds Share the Care Napa Valley
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CASA of Solano County
  • Who funds HEALTHY VALLEJO COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds NEWS
  • Who funds SQUARE PEG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds B WALKER RANCH
  • Who funds Center for Volunteer & Nonprofit Leadership
  • Who funds Childrens Network of Solano County
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT
  • Who funds HANDS ACROSS THE VALLEY INC GEORGE ALTAMURA SR

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA52.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund · Solano Community Foundation · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director?

    Find your warmest path to Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph