Loading…
· Public charity
COMMUNITY PROJECTS INC
Charitable benevolent fundraising
$546k
Granted FY2024
45
Grants
1
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of COMMUNITY PROJECTS INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 45 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $376k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- NAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
- OUT TOWN ST HELENA$25,000
- HEARTS & HANDS PRESCHOOL$25,000
- TEACHER RESOURCE CTR OF N BAY$25,000
- COPE FAMILY CENTER$25,000
- NAPA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$20,450
- SPIRITHORSE THERAPUDIC RIDING CENTER$20,076
- NEWS$20,000
- NAPA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION$16,000
- PROJECT GRADUATION$15,000
- CROSSWALK COMMUNITY CHURCH$15,000
- GIRLS ON THE RUN$15,000
- AMERICAN CANYON MIDDLE SCHOOL$14,672
- THE BRIDGE RESTORATION MINISTRY$12,600
- VINTAGE HIGH SCHOOL$11,800
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 41 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else
41 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
41
63
Total granted
$1.5M
$666k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+52%
+314%
Still filing today
15%
8%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $199k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationAnimalsHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY3× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +118%
- NCNAPA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY3× · 2022–2024 · $44k · revenue +52%
- WCWE CARE ANIMAL RESCUE3× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue +187%
Funded once
- NVNAPA VALLEY SCHOOLSone grant, 2018 · $56k
- NHNAPA HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · $25k
- NVNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +373%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Wildlife Rescue Center of Napa
See Schedule O. We support and advocate for wildlife through: rehabilitation, educaiton, community outreach and partnerships in order to promote sustainable and healthy eco-systems in Napa County for the present and future generations.
Unclassified
2
Northern Santa Barbara County
Nsbcuw is organized to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities in northern santa barbara county, california. nsbcuw works with individuals and organizations to identify and resolve pressing community issues through its…
Philanthropy
3
Sonoma Valley Museum of Art
The Sonoma Valley Museum of Art builds community around art.
Arts & Culture
4
Menlo School
Establish and operate as an educational institution for the education of young men and women.
—
5
Napa Valley Museum
Napa valley museum is an art, history and environmental museum. the museum enriches the cultural fabric of the region with changing exhibitions and educational outreach.
Arts & Culture
6
Marin History Museum
The Marin History Museum is an active, artifact-based institution dedicated to sharing local history with the people of Marin County and beyond.
—
7
St Joseph Health Northern California
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
Health
8
Museum of Sonoma County
The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.
Arts & Culture
9
Napa Valley Community Housing
To develop, own and manage affordable housing for low income residents of napa county.
Health
10
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
11
Napa Valley Presents
The organization funded 16 projects through an open grant program, supporting both individual performing artists and nonprofit organizations across the county.
Arts & Culture
12
Sonoma County Community Architectural
Public outreach and educational programming including but not limited to the field of architecture and related fields of engineering, design, construction, leadership, mentorship, business, and marketing. To provide portfolio opportunity…
Membership Benefit
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cope Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Our Town St Helena. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,006,591Crime & Legal$100,000Human Services$85,000Arts & Culture$62,450Education$45,000Animals$27,500Health$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA22.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community · McNabb Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY PROJECTS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PROJECT GRADUATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 680149679 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PROJECT GRADUATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Community Projects Inc?
Find your warmest path to Community Projects Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines