Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund

The Organization's primary exempt purpose is to hold and distribute board-designated funds for Auction Napa Valley, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, to Napa County non-profit organizations according to the organizations's giving guidelines.

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$21MHealth$19MCrime & Legal$2.4MPhilanthropy$2.0MEducation$2.0MYouth Development$1.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MEmployment$450kArts & Culture$430kOther$12M
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $346k
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.2M
$300,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Napa Valley Unified Ed Fdtn$1,070,000
Mentis$1,050,000
Napa Communities Firewise Fdn$850,000
On The MoveVoices$300,000
UpValley Family Centers$300,000
Queen of the Valley Hospital Fdn$300,000
Aldea Children & Family Svcs$300,000
Napa Cnty Resource Cons Dist$200,000
United Negro College Fund$146,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $20.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UpValley Family Centers: $447k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $436k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $400k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $400k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $350k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $350k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $350k → 9%UpValley Family Centers: $300k → 9%Gunilda Rianda Senior Center: $90k → 9%American Canyon Family Resour: $333k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $580k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $510k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $400k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $400k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $400k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $375k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $375k → 9%On The MoveVoices: $300k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $245k → 9%NEWS: $240k → 9%Napa Emergency Womens Servic: $185k → 9%NEWS: $185k → 9%Mentis: $1.1M → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $835k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $835k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $735k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $635k → 9%Collabria Care: $600k → 9%Collabria Care: $500k → 9%Collabria Care: $500k → 9%Collabria Care: $500k → 9%Mentis: $450k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $400k → 9%Mentis: $400k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $350k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $350k → 9%Mentis: $325k → 9%Collabria Care: $300k → 9%Aldea Children & Family Svcs: $300k → 9%Mentis: $300k → 9%Collabria Care: $300k → 9%Collabria Care: $290k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$59M · 39 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
7

Total granted

$59M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+40%

Still filing today

85%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OLE HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10M · revenue +178%
  • AI
    ALDEA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +33%
  • M
    MENTIS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • QO
    QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $550k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANYON FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $333k · revenue +52%
  • F5
    First 5 Napa County
    one grant, 2017 · $61k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Parenting Institute

California parenting institute (cpi dba child parent institute) is a family resource center, serving families throughout sonoma county since 1978. our mission is to end child abuse and strengthen the health of children, parents, and…

Human Services
2
Novato Parents Nursery School Inc

To deliver affordable, reliable, and safe child care in a nurturing environment, partnering with parents in the education and development of their children and serving the community as one family

Education
3
Sierra Nevada Childrens Services

Sierra Nevada Children's Services enhances the community by supporting quality childcare and empowering families to aspire to life-long success.

Human Services
4
Seneca Family of Agencies

To help children and families through the most difficult times of their lives, regardless of the challenges or circumstances they face.

—
5
North Bay Childrens Center Inc

North Bay Childrens Center provides comprehensive high-quality childcare and early education programs fueled by our vision of excellence and a spirit of innovation. Our mission is to assure optimal development for every child we serve.

Human Services
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential. our vision - we see sonoma county transformed…

Community Improvement
8
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

—
9
Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County

The child abuse prevention council (capc) strives to promote the safety of children and prevent child abuse by raising community awareness, educating our community and providing resources and support to families.

Community Improvement
10
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
11
Northcoast Childrens Services Inc

The NCS Vision: To nurture and empower the whole child and family, to enhance our quality of life, and create a more peaceful community.

Education
12
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Napa Valley and the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr22%41%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr12%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr22%37%20–35yr16%42%35–55yr12%17%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
11%
362/3,403

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/43
Grantees still filing
34/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALDEA INC — $4,440,000 · Human ServicesALDEA INCMENTIS — $3,725,000 · Human ServicesMENTISON THE MOVE — $3,340,340 · Human ServicesON THE MOVEUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $3,033,000 · Human ServicesUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTYCOLLABRIA CARE — $2,990,000 · Human ServicesCOLLABRIA CARENEWS — $1,590,000 · Human ServicesNEWS+5 more — $1,813,333 · Human Services+5 moreOLE HEALTH — $10,237,500 · HealthOLE HEALTHSt Helena Hospital Foundation — $2,215,000 · HealthSt Helena Hospital FoundationQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,050,000 · HealthQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER…COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $1,595,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA C…Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $1,325,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo I…NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $910,000 · Health+2 more — $650,000 · HealthNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $3,155,500 · OtherNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOU…BOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY — $2,425,000 · OtherBOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOY…NAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALLEY PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION) — $1,675,000 · OtherNAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALL…Napa Valley Unif School Dist — $1,496,315 · OtherNapa Valley Unif School D…Community Resources for Children — $1,495,000 · OtherCommunity Resources for C…Napa Resource Conservation — $550,000 · OtherQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER — $550,000 · OtherTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 · OtherTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIRE…+12 more — $1,685,142 · Other+12 moreCope Family Center — $2,387,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyCHILD START INC — $700,000 · EducationAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $555,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $370,000 · Education10000 DEGREES — $358,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC — $1,400,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY — $400,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$20,931,673Health$18,982,500Other$14,231,957Crime & Legal$2,387,000Philanthropy$2,000,000Education$1,983,000Youth Development$1,800,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOLE HEALTH — $10,237,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetALDEA INC — $4,440,000 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetMENTIS — $3,725,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetON THE MOVE — $3,340,340 over 8y, 14% of budgetNAPA VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $3,155,500 over 5y, 60% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $3,033,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetCOLLABRIA CARE — $2,990,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY — $2,425,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetCope Family Center — $2,387,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetSt Helena Hospital Foundation — $2,215,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,050,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $2,000,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALLEY PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION) — $1,675,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $1,595,000 over 7y, 30% of budgetNEWS — $1,590,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetCommunity Resources for Children — $1,495,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC — $1,400,000 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $1,325,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $910,000 over 7y, 21% of budgetCHILD START INC — $700,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center — $625,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetGunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center — $615,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $555,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER — $550,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $450,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCASA A VOICE FOR CHILDREN — $420,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY — $400,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetPEDIATRIC DENTAL INITIATIVE OF THE NORTH COAST INC — $375,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $370,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA — $370,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budget10000 DEGREES — $358,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of the North Bay Inc — $120,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetWayfinder Family Services — $70,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNIMBUS ARTS — $60,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANYON COMMUNITY & PARKS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetWINE UNIFY — $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …McNabb FoundationPeter a & Vernice H G…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Craig and Kathryn Hal…The California Wellne…Queen of the Valley M…St Joseph Health Nort…The Doering Family Fo…E Richard Jones Famil…Syar Foundation Susan…Marin Community Found…
Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA63.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · McNabb Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Queen of the Valley Medical Center · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · The Doering Family Foundation · E Richard Jones Family Foundation Mr E Richard Jones · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines