· Private foundation
Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $615k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT FRANCIS - MANCHESTER | $140,000 |
| LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDENS INC | $100,000 |
| VA MUSEUM OF HISTORY & CULTURE | $100,000 |
| RICHMOND SYMPHONY | $100,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF VA | $75,000 |
| GRACE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC | $50,000 |
| LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES | $50,000 |
| THE DOORWAYS | $40,000 |
| ST JAMES' CHILDREN'S CENTER | $40,000 |
| PETER-PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $35,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS | $30,000 |
| VIRGINIA WAR MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL FDN | $20,000 |
| SHALOM FARMS | $15,000 |
| SHEPHERDS CENTER OF CHESTERFIELD | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $520k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE RICHMOND SYMPHONY2× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +7%
- MFMAYMONT FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +100%
- SJST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER2× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- SMSCIENCE MUSEUM OFone grant, 2021 · $100k
- TRTHE RICHMOND BALLETone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +23%
- VCVA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Good Shepherd Episcopal School is to inspire each child to achieve academic excellence within a diverse, nurturing community that builds character and fosters respect for one another and our shared environment, locally and…
To present powerful voices so richmond can learn. to empower local voices so richmond can lead.
Creating spaces where contemporary art inspires connection, sparks creativity, and fosters innovation.
We produce vital works of classical and contemporary theatre, with Shakespeare as our foundation. We approach this work boldly with a resolve to ignite spirits, educate minds and defy expectation.
VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.
Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.
The mission of washington heritage museums is to preserve, promote and maintain its five 18th century properties in fredericksburg, virginia and develop dynamic educational resources and programs to engage and inspire the intrest of…
To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…
Committed to providing a quality educational experience for each child, creating an environment that nurtures individual intellectual, emotional, creative, spiritual, and physical gifts within a community
The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…
Regents' mission is to provide a classical and christian education, founded upon and informed by a biblical worldview, that equips our students to know, love, and practice that which is true, good, and the beautiful and challenges them to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 1708 Gallery Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grace Christian School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE RICHMOND SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds MAYMONT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND BALLET ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOAR 365 ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HOLLYWOOD CEMETERY ↗
- Who funds THE HARPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Virginia Holocaust Museum ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND HILL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Grace Christian School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN MARSHALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS ↗
- Who funds ELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BETTER HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF POWHATAN INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOME OF RICHMOND FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds CHESTERFIELD CASA INC ↗
- Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc ↗
- Who funds BENEDICTINE SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds The Byrd Theatre Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREATER RICHMOND AQUATICS PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Tesco Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Robins Foundation · Coleman a Hunter - Irr Tr Chari
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole?
Find your warmest path to Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.