· Private foundation
Tesco Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k61 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $139k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Greater Richmond Partnership | $25,000 |
| Venture Richmond Inc | $20,000 |
| St James's Episcopal Church | $18,500 |
| Maggie Walker Community Land Trust | $15,000 |
| The Valentine | $10,750 |
| Anna Julia Cooper School | $10,000 |
| VMFA Foundation | $10,000 |
| Dancing Classrooms of Greater Richmond | $10,000 |
| SPARC | $10,000 |
| 1708 Gallery | $10,000 |
| Anna Julia Cooper School | $8,300 |
| St Christopher's School | $5,500 |
| Wason Center for Civic Leadership | $5,000 |
| The Valentine | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
131 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $118k · revenue +134%
- TVTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +176%
- TRTHE RICHMOND BALLET5× · 2017–2021 · $76k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- WMWilliam & Mary Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +90%
- PEPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF Cone grant, 2022 · $19k
- A(ACTS (AREA CONGRAGATIONS TOGETHER IN SERVICE)one grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…
Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
The richmond symphony performs, teaches and champions music to inspire and unite our communities.
To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…
VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.
To present powerful voices so richmond can learn. to empower local voices so richmond can lead.
The virginia association of museums is a statewide network serving the museum community. the association's mission statement is "the virginia association of museums helps our museum community succeed".
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Vcn is a facilitator of strategic action, a resource for network partners statewide, and a constant preservation presence in richmond. playing a unique role in virginia's conservation community, vcn helps the community speak with one…
The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.
To be a catalyst in Richmond for learning and living through art.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Richmond Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mr Mac Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND BALLET ↗
- Who funds ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS ↗
- Who funds Greater Richmond Partnership Inc ↗
- Who funds 1708 Gallery Inc ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENTURE RICHMOND INC ↗
- Who funds DANCING SCHOLARS VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds UNITE AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Virginia Museum of Fine Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES'S CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL TREES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE CYCLE INC ↗
- Who funds HENRICO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP METRO RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CultureWorks Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMOND INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND BRIDGEPARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAGGIE WALKER COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF CHESTERFIELD ↗
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Robins Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Williams Mullen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tesco Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tesco Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tesco Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.