Skip to content

· Private foundation

William J Shaw Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of William J Shaw Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year William J Shaw Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $170k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
9
’18
10
’19
11
’20
11
’21
10
’22
10
’23
6
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.0MHuman Services$598kEducation$498kCrime & Legal$425kHealth$390kReligion$151kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kInternational$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DVS LEGAL SERVICES$50,000
ALL ABOUT YOU ADOPTIONS$50,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$50,000
BULLIS SCHOOL INC$7,500
CONNELLY SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD$7,000
POTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $359k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $104k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $103k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $98k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $5k → 14%POTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $5k → 8%POTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $5k → 8%POTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $5k → 8%POTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $2k → 8%MARRIOTT FOUNDATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
SD
IN
PA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of William J Shaw Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

William J Shaw Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 18 repeat orgs$294k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$1.9M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+48%

Still filing today

56%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DL
    DVS LEGAL SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +51% · 59% of their budget
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON
    4× · 2017–2021 · $340k · revenue +40%
  • AA
    ALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $225k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • SH
    SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $104k · revenue +100%
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • NB
    NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a genetic disease that causes loss of muscle control and balance, cancer, lung disease, and immune system problems in children and young adults, shortening their lives. The nonprofit A-T Children's Project…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dvs Legal Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,003,960 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacBULLIS SCHOOL: $72,600 · EducationBULLIS SCHOOLACADEMY OF THE HOLY CROSS INC: $262,045 · OtherACADEMY OF THE HOLY CROSS I…ST BARTHOLOMEW CATHOLIC CHURCH: $150,565 · OtherST BARTHOLOMEW CATHOLIC CHU…CONNELLY SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD: $117,500 · OtherCONNELLY SCHOOL OF THE HOLY…CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $35,000 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherSIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $35,000 · Other+15 more: $129,000 · Other+15 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $340,159 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES O…ALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesALL ABOUT U ADOPTION…+2 more: $19,000 · Human ServicesDVS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $375,000 · Crime & LegalDVS LEGAL SER…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $147,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $103,752 · HealthSUBURBAN HO…Mobile Medical Care Inc: $30,000 · HealthMobile Medi…ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION: $25,000 · HealthANNAPOLIS W…+3 more: $12,000 · HealthOPERATION CANASTA INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJUST TRYAN IT INC: $13,500 · PhilanthropyENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,076,560Other$764,110Human Services$584,159Crime & Legal$375,000Health$317,752Arts & Culture$35,000Philanthropy$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,003,960 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDVS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $375,000 over 9y, 59% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $340,159 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INC: $225,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $147,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $103,752 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBULLIS SCHOOL: $72,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMobile Medical Care Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION: $25,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetJUST TRYAN IT INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNew Alternatives for LGBT Homeless Youth Inc: $11,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetRAYMOND A WOOD FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH NEUROIMMUNE DISORDERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBridges from School to Work Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds DVS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds ALL ABOUT U ADOPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BULLIS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION CANASTA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Medical Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds POTOMAC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds JUST TRYAN IT INC ↗
  • Who funds New Alternatives for LGBT Homeless Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND A WOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH NEUROIMMUNE DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridges from School to Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William J Shaw Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William J Shaw Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Bridges from School to Work Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Mobile Medical Care Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Raymond a Wood Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William J Shaw Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph