Skip to content
Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board

The principal purpose of the organization is to create a workforce preparation and employment system designed to meet the needs of the areas businesses and job seekers

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Employment$30MCommunity Improvement$10kHousing & Shelter$8kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $4,532,732, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,501,589 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $968,857 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $262k
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.2M
$26,877
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Private Industry Council$3,449,343
Fayette County Community Action$373,618
Arbor E&T LLC dba ResCare Workforc$328,021
Washington Job Training Agency Inc$112,503
TriCounty Workforce Development Bo$88,687
Westmoreland Community Action$60,695
Keystone Development Partnership$27,877
Pittsburgh Chapter National Tooling$26,877
General Carbide Corporation$15,490
Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare$9,965
Saint Anne Home$9,870
Intervala LLC$9,494
Rochling$6,485
Hamill Manufacturing Company$5,408
Quality Life Services$5,044
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Fayette County Community Action: $421k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $374k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $352k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $291k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $257k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $218k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $191k → 17%Regonal Integrated Human Services: $212k → 10%Regonal Integrated Human Services: $165k → 10%Regional Intergrated Human Services: $141k → 10%Regonal Integrated Human Services: $136k → 10%Westermoreland Community Action Age: $102k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action: $61k → 10%City Mission - Living Stones: $8k → 17%Westermoreland Community Action Age: $42k → 10%Westermoreland Community Action Age: $34k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action: $22k → 10%Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare: $19k → 10%Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare: $16k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action: $15k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action Agenc: $12k → 10%Regional Integrated Human Services: $10k → 10%Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 27 repeat orgs$885k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
16

Total granted

$29M
$859k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+44%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Private Industry Council Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $22M · revenue +23%
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +15%
  • RI
    REGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $664k · revenue +136% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • NC
    NEW CENTURY CAREERS
    one grant, 2019 · $381k · revenue +13% · 36% of their budget
  • WC
    WESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $256k · revenue +5%
  • WP
    WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA OPERATING ENGI JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING F
    one grant, 2019 · $77k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board

The principal purpose of the organization is to create a workforce preparation and employment system designed to meet the needs of the areas businesses and job seekers

Employment
2
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
3
Employment & Training Inc

The corporation operates a variety of programs that provide remedial education, job training services, and information and referral services to disadvantaged individuals in huntingdon and fulton county, pennsylvania.

Employment
4
Pittsburgh Works Together Inc

Educate and advocate on behalf of the construction, energy, and manufacturing industries and the resulting economic and job growth in pennsylvania.

Community Improvement
5
West Central Job Partnership Inc

Job training and workforce development

Employment
6
Mantec Inc

Accelerating manufacturing excellence.

Community Improvement
7
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—
8
Johnstown Area Regional Industries

Create & maintain jobs

Community Improvement
9
Southwestern Pa Corporation

To organize, manage, and supervise southwestern pa commission. to plan, form, promote, and coordinate transportation and economic development of the southwest pa region. to further develop intergovernmental and intermunicipal cooperation.

Public Benefit
10
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
11
WorkSource Montgomery Inc

Assist the Montgomery County WIB, in expanding the Public Workforce Development System in the county, through serving and connecting job seekers and businesses.

Community Improvement
12
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keystone Development Partnership; the most unlike its peers is Seton Hill University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Private Industry Council Inc: $21,951,045 · EmploymentPrivate Industry Council Inc+4 more: $739,179 · EmploymentEquus Workforce Services: $2,357,375 · OtherEquus Workf…Fayette County CTC: $209,410 · OtherFayette Cou…Lifes Work of Western PA: $118,431 · OtherWESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $112,583 · Other+20 more: $400,767 · Other+20 moreFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,101,703 · Human ServicesFAYETTE COU…REGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC: $663,980 · Human ServicesREGIONAL IN…WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $288,841 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAN…+2 more: $53,493 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL TOOLING AND MACHINING FOUNDATION INC: $410,915 · EducationSETON HILL UNIVERSITY: $163,796 · Education+1 more: $4,363 · EducationWESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC: $255,801 · HealthFAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE: $43,195 · HealthMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $16,230 · HealthST ANNE HOME: $15,792 · Health+1 more: $2,773 · HealthWestmoreland County Chamber of Commmerce Education: $113,277 · Community ImprovementThe Redstone Foundation: $109,719 · Community ImprovementPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $49,430 · Community ImprovementECONOMIC GROWTH CONNECTION OF WESTMORELAND: $19,936 · Community ImprovementCATALYST CONNECTION: $19,671 · Science & Tech
Employment$22,690,224Other$3,198,566Human Services$3,108,017Education$579,074Health$333,791Community Improvement$292,362Science & Tech$19,671

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrivate Industry Council Inc: $21,951,045 over 7y, 13% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,101,703 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetREGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC: $663,980 over 5y, 29% of budgetPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL TOOLING AND MACHINING FOUNDATION INC: $410,915 over 6y, 11% of budgetNEW CENTURY CAREERS: $381,165 over 1y, 36% of budgetWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $288,841 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC: $255,801 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSETON HILL UNIVERSITY: $163,796 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI: $155,955 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC: $136,736 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWestmoreland County Chamber of Commmerce Education: $113,277 over 6y, 28% of budgetThe Redstone Foundation: $109,719 over 4y, 21% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA OPERATING ENGI JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING F: $76,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $65,323 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $49,430 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetREDSTONE PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE: $45,001 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE: $43,195 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetECONOMIC GROWTH CONNECTION OF WESTMORELAND: $19,936 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCATALYST CONNECTION: $19,671 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $16,230 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST ANNE HOME: $15,792 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $8,492 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER LATROBE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $4,363 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHESTNUT RIDGE COUNSELING SERVICES: $2,773 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Private Industry Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL TOOLING AND MACHINING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW CENTURY CAREERS ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SETON HILL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Westmoreland County Chamber of Commmerce Education ↗
  • Who funds The Redstone Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA OPERATING ENGI JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING F ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds REDSTONE PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ECONOMIC GROWTH CONNECTION OF WESTMORELAND ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE HOME ↗
  • Who funds CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Richard King Mellon F…Scott Foundation IncHillman Family Founda…Community Foundation …Staunton Farm Foundat…Claude Worthington Be…Nisource Charitable F…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA26.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Scott Foundation Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · Community Foundation of Fayette County Pa · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home