Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board

The principal purpose of the organization is to create a workforce preparation and employment system designed to meet the needs of the areas businesses and job seekers

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Employment$30MCommunity Improvement$10kHousing & Shelter$8kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $4,532,732 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,501,589 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $968,857 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $262k
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.2M
$26,877
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Private Industry Council$3,449,343
Fayette County Community Action$373,618
Arbor E&T LLC dba ResCare Workforc$328,021
Washington Job Training Agency Inc$112,503
TriCounty Workforce Development Bo$88,687
Westmoreland Community Action$60,695
Keystone Development Partnership$27,877
Pittsburgh Chapter National Tooling$26,877
General Carbide Corporation$15,490
Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare$9,965
Saint Anne Home$9,870
Intervala LLC$9,494
Rochling$6,485
Hamill Manufacturing Company$5,408
Quality Life Services$5,044
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Fayette County Community Action: $421k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $374k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $352k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $291k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $257k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $218k → 17%Fayette County Community Action: $191k → 17%Regonal Integrated Human Services: $212k → 10%Regonal Integrated Human Services: $165k → 10%Regional Intergrated Human Services: $141k → 10%Regonal Integrated Human Services: $136k → 10%Westermoreland Community Action Age: $102k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action: $61k → 10%City Mission - Living Stones: $8k → 17%Westermoreland Community Action Age: $42k → 10%Westermoreland Community Action Age: $34k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action: $22k → 10%Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare: $19k → 10%Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare: $16k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action: $15k → 10%Westmoreland Community Action Agenc: $12k → 10%Regional Integrated Human Services: $10k → 10%Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$29M · 27 repeat orgs$885k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
16

Total granted

$29M
$859k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+44%

Still filing today

63%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Private Industry Council Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $22M · revenue +17%
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +15%
  • RI
    REGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $664k · revenue +198% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • NC
    NEW CENTURY CAREERS
    one grant, 2019 · $381k · revenue +13% · 36% of their budget
  • WC
    WESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $256k · revenue +5%
  • WP
    WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA OPERATING ENGI JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING F
    one grant, 2019 · $77k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board

The principal purpose of the organization is to create a workforce preparation and employment system designed to meet the needs of the areas businesses and job seekers

Employment
2
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
3
Employment & Training Inc

The corporation operates a variety of programs that provide remedial education, job training services, and information and referral services to disadvantaged individuals in huntingdon and fulton county, pennsylvania.

Employment
4
Pittsburgh Works Together Inc

Educate and advocate on behalf of the construction, energy, and manufacturing industries and the resulting economic and job growth in pennsylvania.

Community Improvement
5
West Central Job Partnership Inc

Job training and workforce development

Employment
6
Mantec Inc

Accelerating manufacturing excellence.

Community Improvement
7
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

8
Johnstown Area Regional Industries

Create & maintain jobs

Community Improvement
9
Southwestern Pa Corporation

To organize, manage, and supervise southwestern pa commission. to plan, form, promote, and coordinate transportation and economic development of the southwest pa region. to further develop intergovernmental and intermunicipal cooperation.

Public Benefit
10
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
11
WorkSource Montgomery Inc

Assist the Montgomery County WIB, in expanding the Public Workforce Development System in the county, through serving and connecting job seekers and businesses.

Community Improvement
12
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keystone Development Partnership and the most unlike its peers is Seton Hill University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%4%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr18%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr19%4%20–35yr16%82%35–55yr18%9%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/47
the rest of the field
7%
1,021/13,968

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Private Industry Council Inc — $21,951,045 · EmploymentPrivate Industry Council Inc+4 more — $739,179 · EmploymentEquus Workforce Services — $2,357,375 · OtherEquus Workf…Fayette County CTC — $209,410 · OtherFayette Cou…Lifes Work of Western PA — $118,431 · OtherWESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $112,583 · Other+20 more — $400,767 · Other+20 moreFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $2,101,703 · Human ServicesFAYETTE COU…REGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC — $663,980 · Human ServicesREGIONAL IN…WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC — $288,841 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAN…+2 more — $53,493 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL TOOLING AND MACHINING FOUNDATION INC — $410,915 · EducationSETON HILL UNIVERSITY — $163,796 · Education+1 more — $4,363 · EducationWESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC — $255,801 · HealthFAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE — $43,195 · HealthMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $16,230 · HealthST ANNE HOME — $15,792 · Health+1 more — $2,773 · HealthWestmoreland County Chamber of Commmerce Education — $113,277 · Community ImprovementThe Redstone Foundation — $109,719 · Community ImprovementPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $49,430 · Community ImprovementECONOMIC GROWTH CONNECTION OF WESTMORELAND — $19,936 · Community ImprovementCATALYST CONNECTION — $19,671 · Science & Tech
Employment$22,690,224Other$3,198,566Human Services$3,108,017Education$579,074Health$333,791Community Improvement$292,362Science & Tech$19,671

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPrivate Industry Council Inc — $21,951,045 over 7y, 13% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $2,101,703 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetREGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC — $663,980 over 5y, 29% of budgetPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL TOOLING AND MACHINING FOUNDATION INC — $410,915 over 6y, 11% of budgetNEW CENTURY CAREERS — $381,165 over 1y, 36% of budgetWESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC — $288,841 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC — $255,801 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSETON HILL UNIVERSITY — $163,796 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI — $155,955 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC — $136,736 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWestmoreland County Chamber of Commmerce Education — $113,277 over 6y, 28% of budgetThe Redstone Foundation — $109,719 over 4y, 21% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA OPERATING ENGI JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING F — $76,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP — $65,323 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $49,430 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetREDSTONE PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE — $45,001 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE — $43,195 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetECONOMIC GROWTH CONNECTION OF WESTMORELAND — $19,936 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCATALYST CONNECTION — $19,671 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC — $16,230 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST ANNE HOME — $15,792 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC — $8,492 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER LATROBE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $4,363 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHESTNUT RIDGE COUNSELING SERVICES — $2,773 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Private Industry Council Inc
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
  • Who funds REGIONAL INTEGRATED HUMAN SERVICES INC
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE NATIONAL TOOLING AND MACHINING FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NEW CENTURY CAREERS
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES INC
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND CASEMANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTS INC
  • Who funds SETON HILL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC
  • Who funds Westmoreland County Chamber of Commmerce Education
  • Who funds The Redstone Foundation
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA OPERATING ENGI JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING F
  • Who funds KEYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE GERMAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds REDSTONE PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE
  • Who funds FAYETTE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
  • Who funds ECONOMIC GROWTH CONNECTION OF WESTMORELAND
  • Who funds CATALYST CONNECTION
  • Who funds MUTUAL AID AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
  • Who funds ST ANNE HOME
  • Who funds CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA26.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Scott Foundation Inc · Hillman Family Foundations · Community Foundation of Fayette County Pa · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph