· Private foundation
Westminster Barrington Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k111 grants · $148k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER | $10,000 |
| TEMPLE JUDEA | $5,000 |
| DAVE AND MARY ALPER JEWISH | $5,000 |
| DEPAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $2,500 |
| MUSEUM OF SCIENCE | $2,500 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC | $2,500 |
| WORLD CHILD CANCER USA | $2,500 |
| MIAMI CHILDRENS HEALTH SYSTEM INC | $2,500 |
| JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| ACTORS PLAYHOUSE PRODUCTIONS INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
129 repeat relationships — 92 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER6× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +81%- JHJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $53k · revenue +96%
- UOUniversity of Miami8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATIONone grant, 2017 · $5k
- MRMICHAEL-ANN RUSSELL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +2%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMIone grant, 2019 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Center for Government Accountability Inc and the most unlike its peers is Actors' Playhouse Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds Miami Children's Health System Inc ↗
- Who funds DAVE & MARY ALPER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds EAST HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LIFESPAN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER NY INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ACTORS' PLAYHOUSE PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCHESTER FRIENDLY HOME ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NAMI ROCHESTER NY INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY AND SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Pi Kappa Alpha Foundation ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
- Who funds VIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · The Kirk Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Esl Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Westminster Barrington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc — 100% of income from government
- New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
- Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Melrose Alliance Against Violence Inc — 19% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Club of Stoneham Inc — 10% of income from government
- New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- World Ocean School Inc — 4% of income from government
- Rockport Music Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Museum of Discovery and Science Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Book Festival Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
- Greater Boston Stage Company — 2% of income from government
- Historical Association of Southern Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Booksmiles a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Brattle Film Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Lahey Clinic Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Adrienne Arsht Center Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Zoo Miami Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.