· Private foundation
Wenger Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
99% of Wenger Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Wenger Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $284k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $265k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEST PREP | $35,000 |
| CHILDREN'S THEATRE COMPANY | $30,000 |
| MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND | $28,000 |
| MINNESOTA OPERA | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| OWATONNA ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OWATONNA | $15,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART | $12,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $10,000 |
| VOCALESSENCE | $10,000 |
| ST PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| LITTLE THEATRE OF OWATONNA | $10,000 |
| WALKER ART CENTER | $10,000 |
| JAMES SEWELL BALLET | $10,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE-AG480 | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBESTPREP5× · 2018–2022 · $165k · revenue +29%
- OAOWATONNA ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $137k · revenue +119% · 72% of their budget
- MPMINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND5× · 2018–2022 · $132k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- OIOWATONNA ISD #761- DONATION FOR INSTRUMENTSone grant, 2021 · $200k
- OFOWATONNA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -41%
- OSOwatonna Soccer Associationone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of bach society of minnesota is to build a diverse community of music lovers who perform, promote, and appreciate the music of j.s. bach and those he inspired.
We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.
Artaria centers on string quartet performance and education in minnesota. it is committed to presenting inspiring performances, to mentoring string players of all ages, and to illuminate the world's great repertoire of chamber music to a…
To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.
Present opera performances in duluth, minnesota and bring opera to schools in minnesota and wisconsin.
Theater mu produces great performances born of arts, equity, and justice from the heart of the asian american experience.
Performance and Promotion of Choral Music
To promote and encourage development, awareness, and appreciation of the art of chamber music and its role in our culture through education programs, chamber music performances, and sponsorshop of the fischoff chamber music competition.
Minnesota fringe connects adventurous artists with adventurous audiences by creating open, supportive forums for free and diverse artistic expression.
To sponsor, develop, and promote programs of musical excellence for the people of madison and the surrounding area, and to provide music education.
The arts partnership is organized for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of ordway center for the performing arts (the ordway); the saint paul chamber orchestra society; the minnesota opera; and the schubert club. the arts…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Orchestral Association and the most unlike its peers is Owatonna Soccer Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds BESTPREP ↗
- Who funds OWATONNA ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds The Minnesota Opera ↗
- Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School ↗
- Who funds VOCALESSENCE ↗
- Who funds OWATONNA AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
- Who funds OWATONNA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds Owatonna Soccer Association ↗
- Who funds LITTLE THEATRE OF OWATONNA INC ↗
- Who funds BALLET WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds CANTUS ↗
- Who funds BENEDICTINE LIVING COMMUNITY - OWATONNA ↗
- Who funds Steele County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS IN DEBUT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SINGERS MINNESOTA CHORAL ARTISTS ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA BOYCHOIR ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CHORAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION OF MN ↗
- Who funds THE LOFT INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHUBERT CLUB THE ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds STAGES THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA YOUTH SYMPHONIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The McKnight Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Anna M Heilmaier Charitable Fdn · William Boss Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Target Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Elizabeth C Quinlan Foundation · Ea Michelson Philanthropy Co Family Philanthropy Advisors · Hardenbergh Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wenger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wenger Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wenger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.