Skip to content

· Public charity

Welcoming America Inc

Welcoming America supports communities building a welcoming society where every person, including immigrants, can fully contribute and shape our shared prosperity.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$404kCommunity Improvement$354kCivil Rights$213kPublic Safety & Disaster$143kCrime & Legal$74kArts & Culture$71kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $99,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,630 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $92,130 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $93k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE$32,500
RURAL WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT$30,000
ECHO COLLECTIVE$30,000
ONE WORLD ONE LOVE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Idaho Office of Refugees: $35k → 8%WELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENN: $7k → 22%VITENDO 4 AFRICA: $10k → 11%Refugee and Immigrant Service: $31k → 16%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $30k → 21%LATINO MEMPHIS: $10k → 17%Universal Inst for Suc Aging: $30k → 10%COLABORATIVA LA MILPA: $10k → 12%NATL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMER: $10k → 14%ONE WORLD ONE LOVE: $7k → 10%HOME IS HERE - NOLA: $37k → 23%Catholic Charities of Louisvi: $30k → 15%Idaho Office of Refugees: $15k → 8%Refugee and Immigrant Service: $15k → 16%Universal Inst for Suc Aging: $10k → 10%Catholic Charities of Louisvi: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$904k · 15 repeat orgs$547k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +151% since the first grant, against +73% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$904k
$540k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+151%
+73%

Still filing today

80%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GLOBAL DETROIT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $316k · revenue +138%
  • MA
    Michigan Advocacy Program
    2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +194%
  • JI
    JANNUS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +94%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +68%
  • HI
    HOME IS HERE NOLAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center

The CMLC is a community-based center that promotes cultural understanding fosters connections and provides essential services such as English Learning Immigration Support and community-led educational workshops. Our focus is aimed towards…

Community Improvement
2
Center for Immigrant Progress

The organizations primary exempt purpose is charitable and educational.

—
3
Louisiana Organization for Refugees and Immigrants
International
4
New York Immigration Coalition Inc

To unite immigrants, members and allies so all new yorkers can thrive.

—
5
Immigrant Womens Community Center

The mission of the Immigrant Women's Community Center is to provide community building, training, and direct services, primarily for immigrant women and their families, promoting financial independence, emotional health, and physical…

—
6
Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota Inc

The mission of the immigrant law center of minnesota (ilcm) is to enhance opportunities for immigrants and refugees through legal representation for low-income individuals, and through education and advocacy with diverse communities.

—
7
Center for Integration and Migrant Support

CIMS was founded to address the urgent and unmet needs of Sub-Saharan African migrant and refugee families in greater Philadelphia, particularly Congolese households facing food insecurity, trauma, language barriers, and economic hardship.…

Human Services
8
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
9
Immigrant & Refugee Law Center

The Immigrant and Refugee Law Center provides accessible legal services to immigrant and refugee families in the Greater Cincinnati community.

Crime & Legal
10
Community Center for Immigrants Incorporated

Community Center for Immigrants facilitates integration and fosters self-sufficiency in the immigrant community by providing English and Citizenship education programs and immigration legal services. Our goal is to develop the literacy and…

Education
11
The Immigrant Welcome Center Inc

Our mission is to be a trusted partner and advocate for all immigrants.

Civil Rights
12
Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center

The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refugee Community Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Winder-Barrow Community Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
32/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLOBAL DETROIT: $315,764 · Community ImprovementGLOBAL DETROITALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $38,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementJANNUS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesJANNUS INCREFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES & EDUCATION: $46,200 · Human ServicesREFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SER…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOU…NEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN…UNIVERSAL INSTITUTE FOR SUCCESSFUL AGING OF CAROLI UISAC: $40,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSAL INSTITUTE FOR S…HOME IS HERE NOLA: $37,000 · Human ServicesHOME IS HERE NOLAGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'…+6 more: $54,000 · Human Services+6 moreCITY OF DURHAM: $40,600 · OtherCITY OF DURHAMLATINO LINQ: $40,000 · OtherLATINO LINQNATIONAL FARM WORKER MINISTRY: $40,000 · OtherNATIONAL FARM WORKER MINISTRYSALT LAKE COUNTY: $37,000 · OtherSALT LAKE COUNTYUNITECLOUD: $35,000 · OtherUNITECLOUDCITY OF AURORA: $30,000 · OtherCITY OF AURORAMetropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc: $25,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICAN: $25,000 · OtherRural Womens Health Project Inc: $37,000 · OtherRural Womens Health Project IncEVERY CAMPUS A REFUGE: $40,000 · OtherEVERY CAMPUS A REFUGEECHO COLLECTIVE: $37,000 · OtherECHO COLLECTIVECORNERS OUTREACH LLC: $30,400 · OtherCORNERS OUTREACH LLC+8 more: $79,000 · Other+8 moreWave Pool Corp: $36,000 · Arts & CultureWINDER-BARROW COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureMichigan Advocacy Program: $67,500 · Crime & LegalAMANI FAMILY SERVICES: $6,300 · Crime & LegalREFUGEE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $10,000 · Civil RightsNew Orleans Workers Ctr For Racial Justice: $10,000 · Civil RightsMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $10,000 · Civil RightsWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $39,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Lowell Community Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropySIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Community Improvement$363,764Human Services$342,200Other$496,000Arts & Culture$106,000Crime & Legal$73,800Civil Rights$70,000Philanthropy$69,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMichigan Advocacy Program: $67,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJANNUS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY CAMPUS A REFUGE: $40,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION: $40,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSAL INSTITUTE FOR SUCCESSFUL AGING OF CAROLI UISAC: $40,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetREFUGEE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $39,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY: $38,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetECHO COLLECTIVE: $37,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetHOME IS HERE NOLA: $37,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetRural Womens Health Project Inc: $37,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWave Pool Corp: $36,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetUNITECLOUD: $35,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWINDER-BARROW COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCORNERS OUTREACH LLC: $30,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColaborativa La Milpa: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNew Orleans Workers Ctr For Racial Justice: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITENDO4AFRICA: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetST LOUIS CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Lowell Community Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO MEMPHIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $9,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWELCOMING CENTER FOR NEW PENNSYLVANIANS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOne World One Love A NJ Non-Profit: $7,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetAMANI FAMILY SERVICES: $6,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GofundmeorgCA19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · The Kresge Foundation · American Immigration Council · World Education Services Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Borealis Philanthropy · Hispanic Federation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Welcoming America Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Welcoming America Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Welcoming America’s filings →

More from the funding graph