· Public charity
Welcoming America Inc
Welcoming America supports communities building a welcoming society where every person, including immigrants, can fully contribute and shape our shared prosperity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $99,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $191,630 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $92,130 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $93k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE | $32,500 |
| ECHO COLLECTIVE | $30,000 |
| RURAL WOMENS HEALTH PROJECT | $30,000 |
| ONE WORLD ONE LOVE | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +151% since the first grant, against +75% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
GLOBAL DETROIT2× · 2017–2018 · $316k · revenue +138%- MAMichigan Advocacy Program2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +194%
- JIJANNUS INC2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- NENEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +94%
- AFALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +68%
- HIHOME IS HERE NOLAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The CMLC is a community-based center that promotes cultural understanding fosters connections and provides essential services such as English Learning Immigration Support and community-led educational workshops. Our focus is aimed towards…
The organizations primary exempt purpose is charitable and educational.
To unite immigrants, members and allies so all new yorkers can thrive.
The mission of the Immigrant Women's Community Center is to provide community building, training, and direct services, primarily for immigrant women and their families, promoting financial independence, emotional health, and physical…
The mission of the immigrant law center of minnesota (ilcm) is to enhance opportunities for immigrants and refugees through legal representation for low-income individuals, and through education and advocacy with diverse communities.
CIMS was founded to address the urgent and unmet needs of Sub-Saharan African migrant and refugee families in greater Philadelphia, particularly Congolese households facing food insecurity, trauma, language barriers, and economic hardship.…
We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.
The Immigrant and Refugee Law Center provides accessible legal services to immigrant and refugee families in the Greater Cincinnati community.
Community Center for Immigrants facilitates integration and fosters self-sufficiency in the immigrant community by providing English and Citizenship education programs and immigration legal services. Our goal is to develop the literacy and…
Our mission is to be a trusted partner and advocate for all immigrants.
The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refugee Community Partnership Inc and the most unlike its peers is Winder-Barrow Community Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL DETROIT ↗
- Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
- Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSAL INSTITUTE FOR SUCCESSFUL AGING OF CAROLI UISAC ↗
- Who funds EVERY CAMPUS A REFUGE ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND ARAB AMERICAN ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HOME IS HERE NOLA ↗
- Who funds Rural Womens Health Project Inc ↗
- Who funds ECHO COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds Wave Pool Corp ↗
- Who funds CENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITECLOUD ↗
- Who funds WINDER-BARROW COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERS OUTREACH LLC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Colaborativa La Milpa ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN VALLEY OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds MANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EBENEZER HEALTHCARE ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Orleans Workers Ctr For Racial Justice ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · The Kresge Foundation · American Immigration Council · World Education Services Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Borealis Philanthropy · Hispanic Federation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Welcoming America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity Inc — 23% of income from government
- Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc — 18% of income from government
- Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of the Oranges Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.