Skip to content

Nebraska · Nonprofit

ECHO COLLECTIVE

ECHO COLLECTIVE (Nebraska) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $421,954 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF LINCOLN AND LANCASTER COUNTY ($79,980). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$427k
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$422k
Net assets
$272k
7/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 43%
01What it does

What Echo Collective does

Mission

To connect and empower refugee and immigrant women by providing opporunities for personal growth and bulding cross-cultural relationships in a nurturing environment.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The refinery - provides refugee and immigrant women the opportunity to achieve economic independence and build social capital through business education and professional mentorships. Focus on serving women who are still in the process of learning the english language.

    $122,486 spent
    53% of program spending
  2. Refined coaching - provides personalized business coaching for refugee and immigrant businesses that are woman led.

    $51,375 spent
    22% of program spending
  3. Textile weaving - a class for textile weaving in partnership with merchandising, and fashion design department at the university of nebraska - lincoln and with the hand weavers guild of lincoln.

    $23,966 spent
    10% of program spending
  4. Capital readiness - provides personalized buiness coaching or refugee and immigrant businesses that are woman led.

    $18,703 spent
    8% of program spending
  5. All others including - civic leadership, peer support group and yarn circle

    $16,259 spent
    7% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $232,789.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($130k) Expenses 100 ($57k) Net assets 100 ($85k)2023 Revenue 131 ($170k) Expenses 319 ($181k) Net assets 87 ($74k)2024 Revenue 198 ($257k) Expenses 342 ($194k) Net assets 162 ($138k)2025 Revenue 328 ($427k) Expenses 515 ($292k) Net assets 321 ($272k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (328)Expenses (515)Net assets (321)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $148k to $283k (+92%).

$86k
$82k
$148k
$283k
2022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 41% · 2025 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of ECHO COLLECTIVE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$73k
’22
−$11k
’23
$63k
’24
$134k
’25
5.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Lily Ealey

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

20242025
Listed1011
Joined·+3
No longer listed·2
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $19k → $73k.

3 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ECHO COLLECTIVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ECHO COLLECTIVE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

56% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ECHO COLLECTIVE.

19%
largest funder
48%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 79% · 2022 62% · 2023 48% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

55% of ECHO COLLECTIVE's grant income comes from Nebraska funders.

NV
PA
NE
MO
VA
GA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Nebraska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $44k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ECHO COLLECTIVE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 16,849 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin32% · top quartile
Months of reserve5.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)49% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,849 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like ECHO COLLECTIVE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nebraska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 13%Fundraising 7%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ECHO COLLECTIVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ECHO COLLECTIVE?
ECHO COLLECTIVE (Nebraska) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $421,954 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF LINCOLN AND LANCASTER COUNTY ($79,980). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ECHO COLLECTIVE have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $421,954 in grants to ECHO COLLECTIVE, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ECHO COLLECTIVE?
UNITED WAY OF LINCOLN AND LANCASTER COUNTY is the largest funder on record, with $79,980 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ECHO COLLECTIVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Echo Collective →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing