Skip to content
Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
129
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$220k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$6.1MEducation$5.1MHealth$3.7MFood & Nutrition$1.9MArts & Culture$1.4MRecreation & Sports$948kYouth Development$720kPhilanthropy$680kOther$0
02FY2024 · 129 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k92 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.6M
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK$220,000
BYNUM SCHOOL$144,000
MISSION AGAPE$142,000
MANOR PARK INC$100,000
SPRINGBOARD CENTER$100,000
PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION$85,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$80,000
YMCA OF MIDLAND$75,000
SPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS$70,000
BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS$60,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES$60,000
WILL ROGERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$57,000
SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND$55,000
CANDLELIGHT RANCH$55,000
HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $25k → 8%JULIETTE FOWLER HOMES INC: $55k → 14%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $30k → 12%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $50k → 13%JULIETTE FOWLER HOMES INC: $50k → 14%OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $25k → 13%MANOR PARK INC: $100k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $100k → 14%JULIETTE FOWLER HOMES INC: $25k → 14%JULIETTE FOWLER HOMES INC: $25k → 14%JULIETTE FOWLER HOMES INC: $25k → 14%CHILDSAFE: $25k → 16%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $60k → 14%SAMMYS HOUSE: $50k → 10%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $60k → 14%SAMMYS HOUSE: $48k → 10%MANOR PARK: $85k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $60k → 14%REACH UNLIMITED INC: $30k → 16%SAMMYS HOUSE: $44k → 10%MANOR PARK: $85k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $60k → 14%SAMMYS HOUSE: $40k → 10%MANOR PARK: $80k → 12%SAMMYS HOUSE: $40k → 10%MANOR PARK INC: $50k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $50k → 14%SAMMYS HOUSE: $40k → 10%MANOR PARK INC: $50k → 12%SAMMYS HOUSE: $35k → 10%SAMMYS HOUSE: $32k → 10%MANOR PARK INC: $25k → 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%WONDERS & WORRIES INC: $40k → 10%WONDERS & WORRIES INC: $25k → 10%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%WONDERS & WORRIES INC: $25k → 10%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $30k → 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $30k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $30k → 12%CASA DE AMIGOS: $25k → 12%CASA DE AMIGOS: $25k → 12%CASA DE AMIGOS: $25k → 12%CASA DE AMIGOS: $25k → 12%CASA DE AMIGOS: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
NY
IN
CA
MO
NM
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 167 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

167 repeat relationships: 105 still active in FY2024, 62 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

167
61

Total granted

$22M
$918k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+23%

Still filing today

72%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $345k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +91%
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $765k · revenue +60%
  • SL
    SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $695k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARTIN COUNTY COMMUNITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -65%
  • MP
    Marathon Primary Care Services INC
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • IP
    IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS - PERMIAN BASIN
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
3
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
4
West Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc

To support and compliment the work of Workforce Solutions of West Central Texas Board, which is responsible for the planning, oversight, and evaluation of a consolidated workforce system for the 19 County West Central Texas region.

Employment
5
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
6
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
7
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
8
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
9
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
10
Workforce Solutions Borderplex Inc

The organization's mission is to provide skilled workers for employers by advancing education, employment, entrepreneurship and economic development opportunities in support of global competitiveness and regional prosperity. as a workforce…

Employment
11
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
12
West Texas Hero Homes Inc

Support of special needs military or first responders and their families.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Midland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Playland Communities Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

180 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 180 of the 250 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
56
Early backer (in before they grew)
174/180
Grantees still filing
121/180
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,125,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANKSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $730,000 · OtherSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASINOregon Health & Science University: $580,000 · OtherCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $430,000 · OtherRODEO AUSTIN: $401,000 · Other+100 more: $8,242,001 · Other+100 moreSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $695,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND …MANOR PARK INC: $475,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK INCTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $410,000 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBOARD CENT…PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $390,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHI…SAMMYS HOUSE: $328,250 · Human ServicesSAMMYS HOUSEBASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $230,000 · Human ServicesBASIN DREAM CENTER F…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $219,000 · Human ServicesJULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesCASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC: $175,000 · Human Services+19 more: $1,165,000 · Human Services+19 moreTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $765,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIV…The Brookwood Community Inc: $640,000 · EducationThe Brookwood Commun…BYNUM SCHOOL: $524,000 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOLBRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL: $440,000 · EducationBRITE DIVINITY SCHOO…TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $245,000 · EducationTEXAS STATE UNIVERSI…MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $221,000 · EducationRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $190,000 · EducationEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $185,000 · Education+14 more: $1,034,000 · Education+14 moreHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $425,000 · HealthMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $160,000 · HealthCARRIE TINGLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $135,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $130,000 · HealthSTARLIGHT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $65,000 · HealthAlstrom Angels: $50,000 · HealthMarathon Primary Care Services INC: $45,000 · HealthPINK THE BASIN INC: $45,000 · Health+9 more: $190,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION: $315,000 · PhilanthropyWill Rogers Memorial Foundation: $143,000 · PhilanthropyTRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES: $135,000 · PhilanthropySAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $115,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ODESSA INC: $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMISSION AGAPE: $333,000 · Food & NutritionWard County Greater Works Inc: $150,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF AMARILLO TEXAS: $110,000 · Food & NutritionMARTIN COUNTY COMMUNITY FUND INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionTHRIVE DC: $40,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $40,000 · Food & NutritionMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $82,000 · Arts & CultureMARFA PUBLIC RADIO CORPORATION: $80,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST: $68,000 · Arts & CultureMidland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureHISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER OF MIDLAND: $45,000 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND FESTIVAL BALLET: $35,000 · Arts & CulturePERMIAN BASIN HONOR FLIGHT INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $25,000 · Arts & CultureLEVELLAND WALLACE THEATER: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$11,508,001Human Services$4,287,250Education$4,244,000Health$1,245,000Philanthropy$908,000Food & Nutrition$823,000Arts & Culture$495,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,125,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $765,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $730,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $695,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $640,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $524,000 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetMANOR PARK INC: $475,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL: $440,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $430,000 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $425,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $410,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetRODEO AUSTIN: $401,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $390,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetMISSION AGAPE: $333,000 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetSAMMYS HOUSE: $328,250 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetMARC INC: $320,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION: $315,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA: $310,001 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA: $250,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $245,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS: $230,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $221,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $219,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $215,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC: $200,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $190,000 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $185,000 over 7y, 37% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC: $175,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC: $160,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $160,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetWard County Greater Works Inc: $150,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetWill Rogers Memorial Foundation: $143,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $135,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCARRIE TINGLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetTRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES: $135,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetNEW HORIZONS RANCH & CENTER INC: $135,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc: $130,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $130,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHONOR VETERANS NOW: $125,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $120,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetSunshine House Inc: $120,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $120,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $115,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA: $115,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRITE DIVINITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RODEO AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MISSION AGAPE ↗
  • Who funds SAMMYS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ODESSA ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds JULIETTE FOWLER COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds El Reno Public School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger Foundati…Permian Basin Area Fo…Fmh FoundationScharbauer Foundation…Helen Greathouse Char…Pevehouse Family Foun…Beal FoundationThe Henry FoundationWarren Charitable Fou…The Fasken FoundationPaul and Katherine Mo…Bryant Family Foundat…
Abell-Hanger FoundationTX149.3× affinity74 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Beal Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 250 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wayne & Jo Ann Moore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home