Skip to content

· Private foundation

Washkewicz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.3MEducation$1.3MHealth$1.1MRecreation & Sports$1.1MInternational$504kCivil Rights$220kHuman Services$193kPublic Benefit$59kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $137k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$7,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$10M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 99% of reported assets are held in Shares Parker Hannifin.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK & ROLL HALL OF FAME$1,032,500
CLEVELAND METROPARKS$1,000,000
SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION$30,000
GARGIULO EDUCATION CENTER$29,050
NCEF$27,500
BELIEVE BIG$25,000
SUB ZERO MISSION$25,000
NCH CENTER FOR PHILATHROPY$7,500
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$5,000
AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST$3,000
JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE$2,000
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$1,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$1,000
ST RITA PARISH$1,000
GARFIELD HTS EDUCATION FDN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $439k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUB ZERO MISSION: $25k → 9%THE SUB ZERO MISSION: $25k → 9%THE SUB ZERO MISSION: $25k → 9%THE SUB ZERO MISSION: $10k → 9%SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION: $175k → 6%THE SUB ZERO MISSION: $10k → 9%SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION: $75k → 6%THE SUB ZERO MISSION: $10k → 9%SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION: $30k → 6%SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION: $26k → 6%SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%SERVICE SOURCE FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
SD
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 31 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
36

Total granted

$6.3M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+42%

Still filing today

42%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +80%
  • SF
    ServiceSource Foundation Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $334k · revenue +12%
  • BB
    Believe Big Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $237k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CS
    CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +4%
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • N
    NARF
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
3
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
7
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
8
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
9
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
10
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Center for Chronic Illness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
32/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $3,227,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC+1 more: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND METROPARKS: $1,025,000 · OtherCLEVELAND METROPARKSNCEF: $427,500 · OtherNCEFCLEVELAND CLINIC: $100,000 · Other+49 more: $834,450 · Other+49 moreCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationCLEVELAND STATE U…NORTH NAPLES EDUCATION CENTER INC: $233,550 · EducationNORTH NAPLES EDUC…+2 more: $1,100 · EducationServiceSource Foundation Inc: $333,925 · Human ServicesTHE SUB ZERO MISSION: $105,000 · Human ServicesBelieve Big Inc: $237,000 · HealthCONSUMERS FOR DENTAL CHOICE INC: $30,000 · HealthNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $17,350 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $16,200 · Health+3 more: $15,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $125,000 · Environment+1 more: $320 · EnvironmentNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $90,000 · Community ImprovementOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$3,257,500Other$2,386,950Education$1,234,650Human Services$438,925Health$315,550Environment$125,320Community Improvement$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $3,227,500 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetServiceSource Foundation Inc: $333,925 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetBelieve Big Inc: $237,000 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetNORTH NAPLES EDUCATION CENTER INC: $233,550 over 7y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $125,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SUB ZERO MISSION: $105,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONSUMERS FOR DENTAL CHOICE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc: $17,350 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $16,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS OF HOPE INC: $13,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANOPY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY WEST FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Chronic Illness: $5,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE OF LIFE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ServiceSource Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Believe Big Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH NAPLES EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds THE SUB ZERO MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMERS FOR DENTAL CHOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Naples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds MEALS OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Baxter Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The League Club Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washkewicz Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washkewicz Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • North Naples Education Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Washkewicz Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Washkewicz Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Washkewicz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph