Skip to content
Washington Association for Community Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Washington Association for Community Health

The mission of WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$800kEducation$40kEmployment$12k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,560, the rows itemized in this filing. The $97,361 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $90,801 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,560
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION$6,560
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%IOWA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $7k → 10%SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $11k → 9%COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC: $65k → 9%PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $81k → 10%TRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH: $10k → 11%VALLEY VIEW HEALTH CENTER: $7k → 12%NORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF SPOKANE: $12k → 12%COWLITZ FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $21k → 13%LAKE ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $11k → 16%YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $135k → 17%FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $10k → 17%HEALTHPOINT: $135k → 9%COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $22k → 9%NATIVE PROJECT: $11k → 12%COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $28k → 17%SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $135k → 9%HEALTHPOINT: $27k → 9%SEAMAR: $18k → 9%WA SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH ALLIANCE: $50k → 9%WA SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH ALLIANCE: $38k → 9%WASHINGTON SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH ALLIANCE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$498k · 4 repeat orgs$354k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$498k
$347k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+28%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • H
    HEALTHPOINT
    2× · 2019–2022 · $161k · revenue +86%
  • SM
    SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
    2× · 2019–2022 · $152k · revenue +81%
  • WS
    Washington School-Based Health Alliance
    3× · 2021–2023 · $98k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $135k · revenue +31%
  • PC
    PENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $81k · revenue +0%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
3
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
4
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
5
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
6
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
7
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
8
La Pine Community Health Center

La pine community health center improves lives in our community through accessible and affordable healthcare provided with kindness, integrity, and respect.

Health
9
Columbia County Community Healthcare Consortium Inc

The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.

Health
10
Challis Area Health Center Inc

We provide quality healthcare to our community.

—
11
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
12
Columbia Basin Health Association

To provide equal access to quality health care to all persons regardless of age, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or the ability to pay.primary activities: medical, dental, vision and related healthcare services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Cities Community Health; the most unlike its peers is Sea Mar Community Health Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHPOINT: $161,413 · HealthHEALTHPOINTSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $152,141 · HealthSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $134,556 · HealthYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINICWashington School-Based Health Alliance: $98,000 · HealthWashington School-Based Health AllianceCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $86,858 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CAREPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $81,209 · HealthPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICESCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $27,824 · Health+6 more: $71,365 · Health+6 moreCOLVILLE NATION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $11,000 · OtherTRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH: $10,000 · OtherIowa Primary Care Association Inc: $6,560 · OtherTHE NATIVE PROJECT: $11,000 · Education
Health$813,366Other$27,560Education$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHPOINT: $161,413 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $152,141 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $134,556 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington School-Based Health Alliance: $98,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CARE: $86,858 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $81,209 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $27,824 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOWLITZ FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $21,013 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Association of Spokane: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIVE PROJECT: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-CITIES COMMUNITY HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH OLYMPIC HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $7,352 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIowa Primary Care Association Inc: $6,560 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of Washi…Community Health Netw…Seattle FoundationDirect ReliefReach Out and Read IncKaiser Foundation Hea…Inatai FoundationAmerican Cancer Socie…American Heart Associ…Better Health TogetherM J Murdock Charitabl…East Bay Community Fo…
Delta Dental of WashingtonWA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Washington · Community Health Network of Washington · Seattle Foundation · Direct Relief · Reach Out and Read Inc · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Inatai Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Better Health Together · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · East Bay Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington Association for Community Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington Association for Community Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Washington Association for Community Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home