Skip to content
Warm Springs Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Warm Springs Foundation Inc

To empower survivors of life-altering physical disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$3.0MRecreation & Sports$521kHuman Services$139kEducation$30k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $282k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $212k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$42,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$116M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONNECTABILITY$1,018,540
TBI WARRIOR FOUNDATION$56,500
CHILDRENS ASSOC FOR MAX POT$55,000
TEAMABILITY$50,000
PROJECT MEND$50,000
BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION$45,000
SOAR DBA MORGANS WONDERLAND$42,500
THE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF SA$40,632
KINETIC KIDS$38,000
ALAMO HEAD INJURY FOUNDATION$36,000
TEXAS REGIONAL PARASPORT$35,000
RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO$30,000
BRIGHTON CENTER$15,000
THE ECUMENICAL CENTER$8,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO: $35k → 16%ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO: $20k → 16%CONNECTABILITY: $1.0M → 16%CONNECT ABILITY: $667k → 16%CONNECTABILITY: $187k → 16%ALAMO HEAD INJURY FOUNDATION: $36k → 16%ALAMO HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION: $17k → 16%ALAMO HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION: $16k → 16%PRESA COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 16%PRESA COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 16%DISABILITYSA: $20k → 16%PRESA COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 17 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$3.7M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+14%

Still filing today

94%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CONNECTABILITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +78% · 100% of their budget
  • TW
    TBI WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $244k · revenue +311% · 32% of their budget
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (
    4× · 2021–2024 · $205k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SI
    SISTEMA INFANTIL TELETON USA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • DD
    DISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +47%
  • OC
    OPERATION COMFORT
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
2
Autism Service Center of San Antonio Dba Autism Community Network

THE MISSION OF THE CENTER IS TO MAXIMIZE THE POTENTIAL OF CHILDREN WITHAUTISM BY PROVIDING EARLY DIAGNOSIS FOR THOSE WITH LIMITED ACCESS ANDEDUCATING AND EMPOWERING THE COMMUNITY TO SUPPORT THEM. The primary goals of ACN are to provide…

—
3
Easter Seals North Texas

We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.

Health
4
Down Syndrome Assn of Central Texas

The mission of the down syndrome association of central texas (dsact)is to provide education, support, and resources to individuals with down syndrome, their families, professionals, and the community while building public awareness and…

—
5
Achievement Center of Texas Inc

Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.

Human Services
6
Ability Connection Texas

The mission of ability connection is to enrich the lives of people with disabilities...one person at a time. the cornerstone of our programs are the core values of compassion, respect and results through a personalized approach to address…

Health
7
Respite Care of San Antonio Inc

Respite Care of San Antonio is dedicated to providing specialized care for children with special needs and complex medical conditions through a General Residential Operation (GRO), Developmental Childcare Center, and Community Programs for…

Human Services
8
Crossroads Rehabilitation Center Inc

Easterseals crossroads purpose is to change the way the world defines and views disability by making profound and positive differences in people's lives every day.

Health
9
Fundacion Teleton Usa

Raising critical funds and awareness to inspire a more inclusive accepting world for children with disabilities and their families while empowering them to live their lives to the fullest potential.

International
10
Children's Therapy Center

To maximize the potential of children with special needs by providing individualized, family centered intervention services.

Health
11
North Texas Rehabilitation Center Inc

To improve the quality of life for children and adults in North Texas and Southern Oklahoma through medical rehabilitation, and developmental, educational, and wellness services.

Health
12
Novelty Behavioral Health

Our mission is to provide Accessible and Affordable Holistic-Based mental-health care to the communities we serve without without regard to their background or insurance status in a caring environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tbi Warrior Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ls Classic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONNECTABILITY: $1,872,208 · Human ServicesCONNECTABILITY+4 more: $209,000 · Human Services+4 moreCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $205,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAX…Project MEND: $195,000 · HealthProject MENDBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $193,500 · HealthBELIEVE IT FOUNDATIONRespite Care SA Foundation: $107,500 · HealthRespite Care SA Foundati…CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $97,632 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUN…+1 more: $20,000 · HealthTBI WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $243,500 · EducationTBI WARRIOR F…TEAMABILITY INC: $170,000 · EducationTEAMABILITY I…BRIGHTON CENTER: $30,000 · EducationBRIGHTON CENT…Morgan's Wonderland: $132,500 · Recreation & SportsKinetic Kids Inc: $128,000 · Recreation & SportsTEXAS REGIONAL PARA SPORT: $55,000 · OtherOPERATION COMFORT: $18,771 · OtherECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $16,500 · OtherLS CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$2,081,208Health$818,632Education$443,500Recreation & Sports$260,500Other$90,271Philanthropy$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTABILITY: $1,872,208 over 3y, 100% of budgetTBI WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $243,500 over 4y, 32% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $205,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetProject MEND: $195,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $193,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetTEAMABILITY INC: $170,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $132,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $128,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetRespite Care SA Foundation: $107,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $97,632 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALAMO HEAD INJURY ASSOCIATION INC: $69,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetPRESA COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $65,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLS CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSISTEMA INFANTIL TELETON USA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetOPERATION COMFORT: $18,771 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…San Antonio Area Foun…Faye L & William L Co…The Charity Ball Asso…The Texas Cavaliers C…John L Santikos Chari…Harvey E Najim Charit…Mays Family FoundationSt Luke's Lutheran He…Pryor Myra Stafford C…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Professional Contract…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX33.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation Group Return · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Professional Contract Services Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Warm Springs Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Warm Springs Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Warm Springs Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Warm Springs Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Warm Springs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home