Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Professional Contract Services Inc

Mission: enhance the lives of people with disabilities through employment, advocacy, partnerships and innovation.see schedule o for the vision.vision: - the nation's premier non-profit of its kind, a model of balancing business acumen with social responsibility.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$208k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.9MRecreation & Sports$1.3MHuman Services$809kEducation$599kHousing & Shelter$171kReligion$150kAnimals$34kPublic Benefit$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 33 grants below total $976,873 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,332,756 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $355,883 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $493k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $468k
$17,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$251M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS$207,500
CAMP - CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL$100,000
MORGAN'S WONDERLAND$100,000
MOTORCYCLE MISSIONS$60,000
IMAGINE A WAY FOUNDATION$40,000
SAMARITAN CENTER FOR COUNSELING$32,038
HAVEN FOR HOPE$30,000
MINERAL WELLS CENTER OF LIFE$30,000
ADVENTURES ACADEMY OF LIFE LONG LEARNING$25,000
THE ROSEDALE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
DOWN HOME RANCH INC$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$20,000
REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC$20,000
HOPE HOUSE$20,000
HOUSTON SW VET CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $945k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WE ARE BRAVE TOGETHER: $18k → 14%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $60k → 12%STAR GROUP- VETERANS HELPING VETERANS (DAV CH 29): $20k → 14%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $45k → 12%STAR GROUP- VETERANS HELPING VETERANS (DAV CH 29): $15k → 14%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $40k → 12%STAR GROUP- VETERANS HELPING VETERANS (DAV CH 29): $10k → 14%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $25k → 12%SAMMY'S HOUSE: $20k → 10%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $25k → 12%COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR THE DEAF: $10k → 10%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $25k → 12%SAMMY'S HOUSE: $13k → 10%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $20k → 12%DOWN HOME RANCH INC: $10k → 12%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $15k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $50k → 16%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $15k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $15k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 39 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
6

Total granted

$4.8M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+1%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsReligionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    Morgan's Wonderland
    9× · 2017–2025 · $800k · revenue +92%
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (
    9× · 2017–2025 · $605k · revenue +14%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $435k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • AT
    AID THE SILENTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +203%
  • VO
    Veterans of Foreign Wars Dept of TX
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • CS
    Communication Service For The Deaf Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Achievement Center of Texas Inc

Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.

Human Services
2
Dsf Dream a Dream Therapeutic Horsemanship

We are a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to providing equine facilitated therapies to children with developmental disabilities (with a special emphasis in autism) in the greater austin area.

Religion
3
Disabled American Veterans of Texas Service Foundation
Human Services
4
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
5
Freedom Riding

Freedom Riding's mission is to support the treatment and healing of children who could benefit from any a variety of sensory-based engagements, often associated with a variety of conditions: such as attention deficit hyperactivity…

Recreation & Sports
6
Easter Seals North Texas

We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.

Health
7
Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
8
Down Syndrome Assn of Central Texas

The mission of the down syndrome association of central texas (dsact)is to provide education, support, and resources to individuals with down syndrome, their families, professionals, and the community while building public awareness and…

—
9
The Arc of San Antonio Inc

To improve the quality of life for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and those who care for them.

Health
10
Summerhouse Houston

Summerhouse Houston's supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their familites, and our community through employment, volunterism, and partnerships to foster a culture of belonging, choice and respect.

Human Services
11
Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc

Empowering individuals with diverse abilities to reach their full potential through equine-assisted services since 1974.

Recreation & Sports
12
Cognitive Differences Network of Southwest Ohio
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Assoc for Maximum Potential ( and the most unlike its peers is We Are Brave Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFraternal OrganizationsDetroit Regional DevelopmentAnimal Rescue and WelfareDevelopmental Disability Re…Child Welfare & Family Serv…Texas Policy & Legal Educat…Charter and Specialty Schoo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%35%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr10%26%35–55yr13%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%32%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr10%43%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/51
the rest of the field
15%
20,232/136,753

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
36/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Morgan's Wonderland — $800,000 · Recreation & SportsMorgan's WonderlandSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $435,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INCKinetic Kids Inc — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWN HOME RANCH INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesDOWN HOME RANCH INCTEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION — $185,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DE…REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE — $170,000 · Human ServicesREACHING MAXIMUM INDEPE…Respite Care of San Antonio Inc — $105,000 · Human ServicesRespite Care of San Ant…MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION IN…Special Reach Inc — $83,500 · Human ServicesSpecial Reach IncTHE STAR GROUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC — $60,300 · Human ServicesTHE STAR GROUP COMMUNIT…+6 more — $93,500 · Human Services+6 moreCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( — $605,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR M…IMAGINE A WAY — $207,000 · HealthIMAGINE A WAYCasa Esperanza Inc — $65,000 · HealthCasa Esperanza IncMotorcycle Missions — $60,000 · HealthMotorcycle Missions+4 more — $50,000 · HealthMILITARY MAKEOVER LLC — $195,000 · OtherMILITARY MAKEOVE…Samaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc — $177,038 · OtherSamaritan Center…VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM — $60,000 · OtherVA BOSTON HEALTH…VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 5263 — $57,000 · OtherVETERANS OF FORE…TEXAS LANGUAGE LEARNING ALTERNATIVE CORP — $30,000 · OtherCamp For All Foundation — $50,000 · OtherCamp For All Fou…TADSAW INC — $34,000 · Other+8 more — $103,125 · Other+8 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION — $140,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…BRIGHTON CENTER — $130,000 · EducationBRIGHTON CEN…The Brenda & John H Duncan Rise School of Houston — $125,000 · EducationThe Brenda &…RUBY'S RAINBOW — $49,210 · EducationRUBY'S RAINB…THE ROSEDALE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · EducationTHE ROSEDALE…THE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN — $30,000 · EducationTHE RISE SCH…Adventurers Academy of Lifelong Learning — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationMINERAL WELLS CENTER OF LIFE — $150,000 · ReligionMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES — $92,250 · ReligionHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $80,000 · Housing & ShelterCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC — $75,500 · Housing & Shelter
Recreation & Sports$1,280,000Human Services$1,037,300Health$987,000Other$706,163Education$554,210Religion$242,250Housing & Shelter$155,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMorgan's Wonderland — $800,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( — $605,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $435,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDOWN HOME RANCH INC — $250,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetIMAGINE A WAY — $207,000 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetTEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION — $185,000 over 8y, 32% of budgetSamaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc — $177,038 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetREACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE — $170,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMINERAL WELLS CENTER OF LIFE — $150,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION — $140,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER — $130,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Brenda & John H Duncan Rise School of Houston — $125,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $105,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES — $92,250 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Reach Inc — $83,500 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC — $75,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCasa Esperanza Inc — $65,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE STAR GROUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC — $60,300 over 6y, 62% of budgetMotorcycle Missions — $60,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 5263 — $57,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetCamp For All Foundation — $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRUBY'S RAINBOW — $49,210 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc — $45,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE ROSEDALE FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetTADSAW INC — $34,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSAMMYS HOUSE — $32,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS LANGUAGE LEARNING ALTERNATIVE CORP — $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetProject MEND — $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUS ARMY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSUPREME HEADQUARTERS MILITARY ORDER OF THE COOTIE — $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHEART 2 HART DETROIT INC — $15,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAID THE SILENT — $11,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVeterans of Foreign Wars Dept of TX — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISABILITYSA dba FIESTA ESPECIAL DISABILITYSA CREATIVE SERVICES — $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCommunication Service For The Deaf Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH CENTER OF TEXAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWARRIORS WEEKEND — $8,500 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetOPEN MY WORLD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN HOME RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE A WAY ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Center for Counseling and Pastoral Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds MINERAL WELLS CENTER OF LIFE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Brenda & John H Duncan Rise School of Houston ↗
  • Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Reach Inc ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Casa Esperanza Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE STAR GROUP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Motorcycle Missions ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST 5263 ↗
  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RUBY'S RAINBOW ↗
  • Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSEDALE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TADSAW INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMMYS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE RISE SCHOOL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS LANGUAGE LEARNING ALTERNATIVE CORP ↗
  • Who funds Adventurers Academy of Lifelong Learning ↗
  • Who funds Project MEND ↗
  • Who funds US ARMY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds We Are Brave Together ↗
  • Who funds SUPREME HEADQUARTERS MILITARY ORDER OF THE COOTIE ↗
  • Who funds HEART 2 HART DETROIT INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…The Texas Cavaliers C…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Harvey E Najim Charit…Faye L & William L Co…The Moody FoundationHe Stumberg Sr Orphan…Warm Springs Foundati…San Antonio Area Foun…Betty Stieren Kelso F…John L Santikos Chari…Austin Community Foun…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX32.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · The Moody Foundation · He Stumberg Sr Orphans Crippled Children & Handicapped Persons Trust · Warm Springs Foundation Inc · San Antonio Area Foundation Group Return · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Professional Contract Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Professional Contract Services Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Professional Contract Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home