· Private foundation
Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH | $20,000 |
| SIBLEY NATURE CENTER | $5,000 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $1,200 |
| BYNUM SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $100 |
| FIRST TEE WEST TEXAS INC | $100 |
| THE HILLANDER SCHOOL | $100 |
| VETS OF FOREIGN WARS | $100 |
| HOSPICE OF MIDLAND | $75 |
| PARKINSONS FOUNDATION | $50 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY | $50 |
| MIDWEST STATE UNIVERSITY | $25 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $825 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SESIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +84%
- PBPERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +587%
- MSMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- SAST ANNS EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +112%
- MFMIDLAND FAIR HAVENSone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -11%
- SFST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hospice care of terminally ill patients
Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.
Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.
Improving lives by providing exceptional and compassionate therapy services.
The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.
Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Shared Spaces Inc and the most unlike its peers is Crocket Retreat Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST TEXAS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANNS EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC ↗
- Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds MOVING WATERS ↗
- Who funds Hillcrest School Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
- Who funds Nita Stewart Haley Memorial Library ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scharbauer Foundation Inc · The Henry Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.