Skip to content
Walter Iberti Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Walter Iberti Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$49kFood & Nutrition$25kEducation$15kHealth$14kHuman Services$14kInternational$10kPhilanthropy$5kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$325
Median grant
3
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVICES$12,000
ACLU$1,000
FORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVICES VIA GO FUND ME$588
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$325
MONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL$115
BELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARK SOCIETY$103
ASPCA$50
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC$23
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REPRESENT US EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 12%MARIN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%THE WINE COUNTRY MARINES: $500 → 9%FORGET ME NOT FARM: $6k → 10%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $13k → 10%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $100 → 11%CENTER FOR CIVIC EDUCATION: $2k → 14%DIRECT RELIEF: $10k → 14%THREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS: $300 → 7%ASPCA: $50 → 17%WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC: $23 → 20%INDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $10k → 14%NEW GEORGIA PROJECT: $2k → 14%RUKUNDO FOUNDATION USA: $5k → 8%REPRESENT US EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 12%HOMEWARD BOUND: $500 → 8%FORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $12k → 9%FORGET ME NOT FARM: $5k → 10%WIKIMEDIA: $26 → 10%MONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL: $2k → 14%INDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $5k → 14%REPRESENT US EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 12%BELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARK SOCIETY: $250 → 8%FORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 9%FORGET ME NOT FARM: $3k → 10%WIKIMEDIA: $25 → 10%MONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL: $2k → 14%INDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $5k → 14%BELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARK SOCIETY: $250 → 8%FORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVICES VIA GO FUND ME: $588 → 9%FORGET ME NOT FARM: $2k → 10%ACLU: $1k → 10%MONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL: $1k → 14%INDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $5k → 14%BELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARK SOCIETY: $103 → 8%REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $7k → 9%FORGET ME NOT FARM: $1k → 10%KQED: $200 → 10%MONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL: $115 → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY US: $500 → 14%BELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARK SOCIETY: $100 → 8%REAGAN JO FOUNDATION: $200 → 9%KQED: $200 → 10%RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $36 → 14%HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $2k → 9%KQED: $200 → 10%ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$84k · 9 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$84k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsPublic BenefitEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INDIVISIBLE CIVICS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $25k · revenue -3%
  • RE
    RepresentUs Education Fund
    3× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue -58%
  • FM
    FORGET ME NOT FARM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $17k

Funded once

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue -9%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +8%
  • HI
    HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +414%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Business Executives for National Security

Bens applies industry experience and best business practices to help address our nation's pressing national security challenges.

International
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Free Press Action Fund

Free press action fund fights for your rights to connect and communicate. we fight to save the free and open internet, curb runaway media consolidation, protect press freedom, and promote digital civil rights. we believe that change…

Civil Rights
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
11
Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The biotechnology innovation organization (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora. bio is founded on the principle that policy must nurture innovation in the…

—
12
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marin General Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Reagan Jo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORGET ME NOT FARM: $16,900 · OtherFORGET ME NOT FARMFORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $13,000 · OtherFORGET ME NOT FARM CHILDREN'S SERVIC…RUKUNDO FOUNDATION USA: $5,000 · OtherRUKUNDO FOUNDATION USAANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $2,500 · OtherANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INCCENTER FOR CIVIC EDUCATION: $2,000 · Other+13 more: $5,076 · Other+13 moreINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $25,000 · Civil RightsINDIVISIBLE CIVICSNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT IN…RepresentUs Education Fund: $20,000 · Public BenefitRepresentUs Educ…+1 more: $500 · Public BenefitHOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationHOFFMAN INST…MONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL OF SANTA BARBARA: $5,215 · EducationMONTESSORI C…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $12,700 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthMARIN GENER…+1 more: $100 · HealthDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 · InternationalREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $7,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $300 · Food & Nutrition
Other$44,476Civil Rights$27,000Public Benefit$20,500Education$15,215Health$13,800International$10,000Food & Nutrition$7,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $12,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTESSORI CENTER SCHOOL OF SANTA BARBARA: $5,215 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVIC EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELVEDERE-TIBURON LANDMARKS SOCIETY: $703 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKING RIDGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINE COUNTRY MARINES: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHREE VILLAGE MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREAGAN JO FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCUREBOUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Marin Community FoundationCA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter Iberti Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter Iberti Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter Iberti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home