Skip to content
Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$103kEducation$25kEnvironment$24kHuman Services$14kRecreation & Sports$14kYouth Development$10kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$100
Median grant
3
States reached
$204k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
SIBLEY NATURE CENTER$5,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$1,200
BYNUM SCHOOL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
FIRST TEE WEST TEXAS INC$100
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$100
VETS OF FOREIGN WARS$100
THE HILLANDER SCHOOL$100
HOSPICE OF MIDLAND$75
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$50
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$50
MIDWEST STATE UNIVERSITY$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMAL IDD DBA THE ROCK HAUS FOUNDATION: $30 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 → 14%ARC OF ACADIAN: $100 → 23%MOVING WATERS: $500 → 16%MOVING WATERS: $500 → 16%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250 → 14%CASA DE AMIGOS: $250 → 14%CASA DE AMIGOS: $50 → 14%PERMIAN BASIN WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER THE LIFE CENTER FOUNDATION: $100 → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $250 → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $100 → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $500 → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $100 → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $100 → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 29 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
49

Total granted

$168k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+26%

Still filing today

72%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $825 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +84%
  • PB
    PERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +587%
  • BS
    BYNUM SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2024 · $1k · revenue +278%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANNS EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +112%
  • MF
    MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -11%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
2
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
3
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
4
Permian Basin Rehabilitation Center

Improving lives by providing exceptional and compassionate therapy services.

Health
5
Mission Health Care Inc

The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.

Health
6
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
7
Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
9
Health Services of North Texas Inc

Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…

Health
10
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Shared Spaces Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crocket Retreat Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
35/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $101,150 · OtherST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCHST ANNS EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $15,000 · OtherST ANNS EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC+59 more: $29,575 · Other+59 moreWEST TEXAS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $23,800 · Recreation & SportsWEST TEXAS Y…+1 more: $100 · Recreation & SportsSIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $23,750 · EnvironmentSIBLEY ENVIR…MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterREFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC: $200 · Housing & ShelterPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $800 · HealthMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $350 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 · Health+3 more: $200 · HealthMOVING WATERS: $1,000 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK INC: $600 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $350 · Human ServicesCASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC: $300 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $200 · Human Services+5 more: $430 · Human Services
Other$145,725Recreation & Sports$23,900Environment$23,750Housing & Shelter$5,200Philanthropy$5,100Health$4,500Human Services$3,130

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST TEXAS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $23,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $23,750 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetST ANNS EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $1,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND SHARED SPACES INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHillcrest School Inc: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMANOR PARK INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNita Stewart Haley Memorial Library: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND TEXASINC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILLANDER SCHOOL INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUSH TENNIS CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRanching Heritage Association: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF ACADIANA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVI COMMUNITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERWOOD & MYRTIE FOSTER'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER THE LIFE CENTER FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCrocket Retreat Center: $100 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMAL IDD: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scharbauer Foundation…The Henry FoundationWarren Charitable Fou…Beal FoundationPevehouse Family Foun…Abell-Hanger Foundati…Permian Basin Area Fo…Yarborough FoundationThe Fasken FoundationHelen Greathouse Char…Paul and Katherine Mo…Fmh Foundation
Scharbauer Foundation IncTX51.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scharbauer Foundation Inc · The Henry Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter & Jere Hubbard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home