Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walsh Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$191kReligion$155kHealth$99kEducation$32kHuman Services$26kInternational$12kRecreation & Sports$6kPhilanthropy$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$199k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITYSQUASH$70,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
UBUNTU PATHWAYS$25,000
CHRISTIANITY TODAY$18,000
PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$6,000
PROPAGATION OF THE FAITH$5,000
CLARITY'S WOMAN CENTER$5,000
GFW FUND$5,000
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC$4,200
THE GUNNAR WOELFEL FOUNDATION$2,500
SAMARITANS PURSE$2,500
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$2,000
THE V FOUNDATION$2,000
FOCUS$1,500
STREET SQUASH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AVAIL NYC: $5k → 17%5 STEPS TO FIVE: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$438k · 12 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
35

Total granted

$438k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+38%

Still filing today

75%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    City Squash Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $187k · revenue +61%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $28k · revenue +133%
  • UP
    UBUNTU PATHWAYS INC
    2× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • EM
    ELENOR MARTIN RESIDENCE FOR MOTHER AND CHILD
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
2
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
N Y C Mission Society

NYC Mission Society improves the lives of children, youth and families in the City's most underserved communities. Through programs and services that respond to community needs, we create cycles of success for generations to come.

Human Services
5
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
6
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
7
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
8
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
9
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
10
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
11
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
12
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Fellowship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY CHURCH: $122,500 · OtherTRINITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $50,000 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CENTER+39 more: $85,625 · Other+39 moreCity Squash Inc: $186,500 · Recreation & SportsCity Squash Inc+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsPREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $27,500 · HealthPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $6,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE FOCUS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthUBUNTU PATHWAYS INC: $26,000 · EducationThe New York City Leadership Center Inc: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $600 · EducationChristianity Today International: $18,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,500 · ReligionFriends of the Great Commission: $3,350 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $5,135 · InternationalCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $1,425 · InternationalAVAIL NYC: $5,000 · Human Services5 Steps to Five: $250 · Human Services
Other$308,125Recreation & Sports$187,500Health$44,000Education$31,600Religion$24,850International$8,060Human Services$5,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCity Squash Inc: $186,500 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $27,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUBUNTU PATHWAYS INC: $26,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetChristianity Today International: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $5,135 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe New York City Leadership Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVAIL NYC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOCUS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of the Great Commission: $3,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe LAM Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWE WANT MORE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF PORT CHESTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget5 Steps to Five: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UBUNTU PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds Christianity Today International ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York City Leadership Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds AVAIL NYC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Great Commission ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds The LAM Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Tom and Cashie Egan Family Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walsh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walsh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walsh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph