Skip to content
W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services at a glance

· Private foundation

W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$248k
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$241kHuman Services$222kHealth$213kHousing & Shelter$119kArts & Culture$107kCommunity Improvement$66kReligion$53kYouth Development$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k59 grants · $198k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION$20,000
KANSAS CITY UNIVERSITY - JOPLIN$20,000
FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC DBA LAFAYETTE HOUSE$10,000
AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X$5,500
COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SWMO$5,000
HEARTS AND HAMMERS$5,000
BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN$5,000
NEOSHO SCHOOL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
PRO MUSICA$5,000
HOPE 4 YOU BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF JASPER NEWTON COUNTY$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI$5,000
VISION CARTHAGE$5,000
VITA NOVA VILLAGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FOSTERING HOPE: $6k → 18%FOSTERING HOPE: $5k → 18%FOSTERING HOPE: $5k → 18%FOSTERING HOPE: $3k → 18%AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X: $6k → 15%AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X: $5k → 15%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $10k → 18%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $8k → 18%AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X: $5k → 15%AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X: $3k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY Y: $3k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 15%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $5k → 18%VITA NOVA VILLAGE: $5k → 18%CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA: $5k → 18%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $5k → 18%CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA: $5k → 18%BRIGHT FUTURES JOPLIN: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 58 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

58 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
17

Total granted

$1.2M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+9%

Still filing today

66%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $89k · revenue +13%
  • FH
    FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $56k · revenue +19%
  • JC
    JASPER COUNTY CASA
    3× · 2021–2025 · $36k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • JR
    JOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -81%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF JOPLIN
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH JOPLIN
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Life Resource Services of Jackson County

Our mission is to help those who are struggling with homelessness, by providing resources to help rebuild their lives.

Human Services
3
The Lighthouse Shelter Inc

To decrease the incidence of domestic violence and sexual assault in saline county, missouri, through community awareness, counseling, shelter, direct services and support groups.

—
4
Jasper County Fuller Center for Housing Inc

Provide simple, decent housing for the needy

—
5
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
6
James-Moorehouse Inc

To provide a safe place for victims of human traff

Human Services
7
Job Haines Home for Aged People
—
8
Jefferson County Youth Shelterinc

The organization's mission is to promote the well-being and healthy development of the community's youth and families

Human Services
9
Mental Health Assoc in Jefferson County Inc

The mental health association is committed to individual service in a community based setting that promotes recovery, dignity, personal growth, self determination and health.

—
10
Freeman Neosho Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, quality healthcare solutions.

Health
11
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
12
Jackson Area Council On Alcoholism and Drug Dependancy

To provide the highest quality of care possible to people who are suffering from substance abuse disorders or co-occuring mental health disorders in an environment that preserves and promotes the dignity of the indivdiual without regard to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joplin Historical & Mineral Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
33/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KANSAS CITY UNIVERSITY - JOPLIN: $80,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY UNIVERSITY - JOPLINWATERED GARDENS MINISTRIES: $36,950 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $35,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherJOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I: $33,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherHIGHER POWER GARAGE: $29,000 · Other+54 more: $459,124 · Other+54 moreFREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM: $56,058 · HealthFREEMAN HEA…CARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC: $22,038 · HealthCARTHAGE CR…HOPE 4 YOU BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthHOPE 4 YOU …LIFECHOICES: $18,000 · HealthLIFECHOICESASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $7,000 · HealthASCENT RECO…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION: $89,000 · EducationMISSOURI S…JOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE: $20,000 · EducationJOPLIN REG…NEOSHO SCHOOL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationNEOSHO SCH…Bright Futures Joplin: $33,000 · Human ServicesBright Fu…FOSTERING HOPE: $18,700 · Human ServicesFOSTERING…AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X: $18,000 · Human ServicesAREA AGEN…CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA: $10,000 · Human ServicesCROSSLINE…JOPLIN FAMILY Y: $6,000 · Human ServicesJOPLIN FA…Solace House of the Ozarks Inc: $5,250 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD LIFE HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesVITA NOVA VILLAGE: $5,000 · Human ServicesGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25,500 · Arts & CultureConnect2Culture: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJASPER COUNTY CASA: $35,500 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST: $12,185 · Crime & LegalRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 · Crime & LegalBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JASPER AND NEWTON COUNTIES INC: $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$766,074Health$125,096Education$120,000Human Services$100,950Arts & Culture$55,500Crime & Legal$50,685Youth Development$50,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION: $89,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM: $56,058 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA: $35,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I: $33,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBright Futures Joplin: $33,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $30,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHIGHER POWER GARAGE: $29,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetConnect2Culture: $25,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTS AND HAMMERS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO: $23,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC: $22,038 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGods Resort Inc: $21,300 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNEOSHO AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $21,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHOPE 4 YOU BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetVISION CARTHAGE: $20,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetJoplin Humane Society Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE: $18,700 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetLIFECHOICES: $18,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X: $18,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE: $17,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetWEBB CITY FARMERS MARKET: $17,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP: $16,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetPRO MUSICA: $16,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetCreative Learning Alliance Inc: $12,700 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST: $12,185 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEOSHO SCHOOL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetEconomic Security Corporation of Southwest Area: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSLINES CHURCHES OF THE JOPLIN AREA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HELP CENTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSolace House of the Ozarks Inc: $5,250 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD LIFE HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCARTHAGE ARTS SUPPORT TEAM: $4,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetJOPLIN TRAILS COALITION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCARTHAGE CROSSLINES MINISTRY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJoplin Transitional Housing Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JASPER AND NEWTON COUNTIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJOPLIN WORKSHOP INC: $2,087 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE FOUR STATES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOPLIN AREA FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC: $2,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetNEOSHO CROSSLINES MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I ↗
  • Who funds Bright Futures Joplin ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER POWER GARAGE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Connect2Culture ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS AND HAMMERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Gods Resort Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEOSHO AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE 4 YOU BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION CARTHAGE ↗
  • Who funds Joplin Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
  • Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING REGION X ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN HISTORICAL & MINERAL MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE ↗
  • Who funds WEBB CITY FARMERS MARKET ↗
  • Who funds WILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds PRO MUSICA ↗
  • Who funds Creative Learning Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Jean Jack and Mildred…Arvest FoundationFredrick G and Rebeka…Cragin Joy Spiva Char…Freeman R Johnson Tru…Jasper County Associa…Commerce Bancshares F…Cloyd a Carlin Charit…Freeman Health SystemIr Tua KD&ML Steadley…The Farber Foundation
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO70.2× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Arvest Foundation · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Jasper County Association for Social Ser · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust · Freeman Health System · Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable · The Farber Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services?

    Find your warmest path to W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home