Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
Help train non-profits to tell their story better and share their mission; create new opportunities for non-profits to tell their stories to corporations,business leaders, an
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $427k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization serves families in crisis by providing temporary shelter, meals, mental health counseling, life skill education, financial literacy training, referral services and comprehensive case management, through our Road to…
Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Florida for newcomers by helping these underserved communities navigate the legal system through education and innovation.
Family Promise North Central Palm Beach County is responding to the ongoing crisis of family homelessness in Palm Beach County, Florida by uniting with our community partners to help local homeless children by empowering their families to…
The organization was formed in 1996 to provide a variety of effective treatment services to individuals and families who are affected by mental health, substance abuse and co-occurring disorders. in 2018, the organization initiated case…
The creation of a comprehensive and integrated system of services to homeless persons in the central florida area.
Mission is to Eliminate Homelessness Among Veterans In Central Florida. Programs include the following: "Search and Rescue", "Transitional Housing and Post Traumatic Stress Awareness".
To develop, manage and operate the First Step Shelter Program, a homeless assistance service program and shelter in Volusia County, Florida.
The mission of the volusia/flagler county coalition for the homeless is to coordinate resources to assist families and individuals at risk of homelessness or currently experiencing homelessness to maintain or regain self-sufficiency.
Central florida community action agency implements programs that focus on achieving outcomes by engaging community partners in helping people living in poverty strengthen their lives.
The mission of the organization is to offer protection and quality services for victims of domestic and sexual abuse and their minor children in st. johns county, florida through the establishment and operation of a temporary shelter and…
The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.
To truly make a difference in the lives of St. Johns County homeless families with minor children by providing housing and services required for them to remain intact, stabilize their lives, save money, move into permanent housing, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victim Service Center of Central Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Picnic Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Heart of Florida United Way Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Orlando Health Inc · The Chatlos Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Devos Family Foundation · Elizabeth Morse Genius Foundation · Westgate Resorts Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation Victory Cup Initiative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PAVING THE WAY FOUNDATION Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.6× since.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 812373127 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PAVING THE WAY FOUNDATION Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Victory Cup Initiative Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.