How much did CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION reported 3 grants totaling $119,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION based?

CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION is based in FL.

CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION

The cfwl foundation raises funds through a variety of events during the year to provide charitable donations to local non-profit organizations and college scholarships based on academics, community service and financial need.

$119k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$38k

Largest

01What you fund

0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$135kHealth$92kYouth Development$63kEducation$58kHousing & Shelter$12kFood & Nutrition$12kAnimals$10kOther$121k

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$452k

Total assets

Largest grants

SPECIAL HEARTS FARM INC$38,000
SENIORS FIRST INC$25,000
EIGHT WAVES CORPORATION$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$120k · 3 repeat orgs$383k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$120k

$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+85%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UA
UNITED AGAINST POVERTY
2× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +43%
SF
SENIORS FIRST INC
3× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +88%
SH
SHEPHARDS HOPE INC
2× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue -24%

Funded once

FL
FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +85%
EC
EDGEWOOD CHILDRENS RANCH
one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +15%
TG
THE GREATEST INVESTMENT GIRLS ENPOW
one grant, 2023 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Florida Home Partnership Inc

To empower hard working citizens to achieve the american dream of homeownership by providing quality, affordable housing to families living below the median income.

Housing & Shelter

Goodwill Industries of Sw Florida Inc

Goodwill industries of southwest florida is committed to serving people with disabilities and disadvantages by offering life-changing opportunities to achieve independence.

Employment

New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need.

Human Services

Suncoast Center Inc

Strengthening, protecting and restoring lives for a healthy community.

Health

The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Provides health, human, & community services for the terminally ill and their families.

Human Services

Abilities Inc of Florida

To facilitate services for people with disabilities to build more inclusive communities.

Employment

Grace Medical Home Foundation Inc

The Organization supports and furthers the interests of Grace Medical Home, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation that is exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Human Services

Suncoast Humane Societyinc

Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…

Animals

Hopehealth Inc

To provide primary medical care.

Health

Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—

Opportunity Center Inc

To facilitate services for people with disabilities to build more inclusive communities.

—

The Family Healthcare Foundation Inc

Ensuring access to high-quality healthcare for all in the tampa bay area.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Care Center for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Against Poverty Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/30

the rest of the field

16%

1,073/6,766

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

25/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$134,632Other$120,948Health$91,955Youth Development$62,500Education$58,465Housing & Shelter$12,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Florida FoundationFL39.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Heart of Florida United Way Inc · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Orlando Health Inc · The Chatlos Foundation Inc · The Lee Foundation · The Galloway Foundation · Westgate Resorts Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

20get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE GREATEST INVESTMENT GIRLS ENPOW.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 462901089 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE GREATEST INVESTMENT GIRLS ENPOW, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Central Florida Womens League Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Central Florida Womens League Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Central Florida Womens League Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CENTRAL FLORIDA WOMENS LEAGUE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Central Florida Womens League Foundation?

More from the funding graph