Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vander Meer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$902kReligion$420kHuman Services$69kPublic Benefit$51kCrime & Legal$31kHealth$28kYouth Development$25kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$473k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST REFORMED CHURCH$105,000
WITNESSING MINISTRIES OF CHRIST$10,000
IMAGINE FOUNDATION$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES$8,000
EQUIPNET$8,000
ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS$2,000
LOVELANDBERTHOUD MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
LOST LAKE - RANDOLPH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
COMMUNITY KITCHEN$2,000
PRESBYTERIAN FRONTIER FELLOWSHIP$2,000
PARKINSON RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC$2,000
HOPE NOW BIBLE CHURCH$2,000
HOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $1k → 11%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
CA
CO
VA
MD
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$685k · 26 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$685k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+92%

Still filing today

77%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JOSHUA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $58k · revenue +99%
  • IF
    IMAGINE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $54k · revenue +83%
  • PF
    PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • AL
    American Legacy Academygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue ×41 · 51% of their budget
  • VO
    VILLAGE OF RANDOLPH WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
5
Americans for Tax Reform

American for Tax Reform (ATR) is a national grassroots organization focused on increasing public awareness about the size and regulations of government and rallying support for lower taxes, smaller government and congressional…

—
6
A3

A3 changes the few who change the many. we equip and unify visionary christ-centered leaders to influence spirit-led change. we are a vibrant community accelerating christ-centered movements around the world. a3 nurtures intentional…

Religion
7
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
8
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
9
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
10
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
11
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
12
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Self-Sufficiency of Northern Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $762,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEAmerican Legacy Academy: $75,000 · EducationAmerican Legacy AcademyJOSHUA INC: $57,500 · EducationJOSHUA INC+2 more: $7,500 · EducationFIRST REFORMED CHURCH: $315,000 · OtherFIRST REFORMED CHURCHVILLAGE OF RANDOLPH WISCONSIN: $50,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF RANDOLPH WISCONSIN+13 more: $87,600 · Other+13 moreWitnessing Ministries of Christ: $52,000 · ReligionEQUIPNET: $26,000 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN FRONTIER FELLOWSHIP: $9,000 · ReligionPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $8,000 · ReligionIMAGINE FOUNDATION: $53,700 · Human ServicesAlternatives to Violence Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $31,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC: $10,500 · Crime & LegalParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $7,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $5,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · HealthALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $14,000 · International
Education$902,000Other$452,600Religion$95,000Human Services$55,700Crime & Legal$41,500Health$16,500International$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $762,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Legacy Academy: $75,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetJOSHUA INC: $57,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetIMAGINE FOUNDATION: $53,700 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetWitnessing Ministries of Christ: $52,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEQUIPNET: $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN: $9,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN FRONTIER FELLOWSHIP: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO: $8,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LIVINGSTONIA FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORADO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR CHRISTIAN CONFERENCES TEACHING & SERVICE INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlternatives to Violence Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK TO PEAK CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American Legacy Academy ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Witnessing Ministries of Christ ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds EQUIPNET ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE NOW FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN FRONTIER FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds TUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LIVINGSTONIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR CHRISTIAN CONFERENCES TEACHING & SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Parkinson Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives to Violence Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PEAK TO PEAK CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO19.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Daniels Fund · Anschutz Family Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Food Bank for Larimer County · United Way of Larimer County · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · El Pomar Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vander Meer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vander Meer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vander Meer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph