Skip to content

· Private foundation

Valley View Foundation Inc

DEVELOP AND SUPPORT PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES THAT PROMOTE AND IMPROVE THE HEALTH AND WELLNESS OF THE RESIDENTS OF ADA, OK AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS.

$782k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$294k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$12MEducation$2.8MPhilanthropy$2.5MCommunity Improvement$480kHuman Services$241kPublic Benefit$212kHousing & Shelter$170kScience & Tech$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
  • $250k+2 grants · $544k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADA COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER$294,364
PONTOTOC TECHNOLOGY CENTER$250,000
COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC$80,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
TEAM TYMAN LOVE LEGACY CORP$40,000
ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER$30,000
CHICKASAW NATION FOUNDATION$28,069
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $8k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $8k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $6k → 16%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $35k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $35k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $30k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $30k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $30k → 14%ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 16 repeat orgs$765k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +139% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$16M
$687k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%
+34%

Still filing today

75%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADA
    5× · 2018–2022 · $3.5M · revenue +1% · 81% of their budget
  • EC
    EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +573%
  • CO
    COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $799k · revenue +291% · 80% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF ADA
    one grant, 2019 · $212k
  • CA
    CALL A RIDE
    one grant, 2019 · $150k
  • SO
    SOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Oklahoma Family Care Center

The western oklahoma family care center show's god's love by helping families in western oklahoma overcome barrier in their lives in order to help them become contributinng self-supporting citizens

Philanthropy
2
Dentists Donating Smiles to Oklahomans Inc

To restore the oral health of low-income, uninsured elderly and developmentally disabled oklahomans by providing free dental care to Oklahomans.

—
3
Convenience Distributors Ok
—
4
Oklahoma Pregnancy Care Network Inc

Oklahoma pregnancy care network is committed to assisting pregnant women and their families in need of compassionate, practical, and life affirming alternatives to abortion.

Health
5
Community Health Center of Northeast Oklahoma

We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.

Health
6
Eastern Oklahoma Donated Dental Services Inc

Provide free dental services, preventive dental education, and free oral/dental health care supplies to economically disadvantaged, dentally challenged disabled or elderly individuals, and/or vulnerable populations of eastern oklahoma.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma Dental Association

Fosters an awareness of the obligations and responsibilities of the dental profession to society, to help advance the art and science of dentistry, and to promote public health and health services in the state of oklahoma.

—
8
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
9
Mercy Hospital Ada Inc

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—
10
Oklahoma Coalition for Affordable Housing Inc

The organization is an advocacy and member organization that helps lead the movement to ensure that all residents in oklahoma flourish in safe, afordable homes and the helps communities develope safe and afordable housing options.

Community Improvement
11
Tulsa Day Center Inc

To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
12
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Ada; the most unlike its peers is Abba's Tables Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADA COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER: $7,307,863 · OtherADA COMMUNITY CANCER CENTERMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADA: $3,541,830 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADAEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,470,957 · OtherEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCBECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,390,216 · OtherBECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC+14 more: $1,234,287 · Other+14 moreCOMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC: $799,310 · HealthTEAM TYMAN LOVE LEGACY CORP: $260,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 · HealthSOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INC: $100,000 · HealthLighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers: $72,500 · Health+2 more: $33,000 · HealthADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC: $185,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $170,000 · Housing & ShelterMcCalls Chapel School Inc: $63,500 · Education22nd Judicial District CASA Inc: $7,400 · EducationABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED: $54,000 · Food & NutritionOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$16,945,153Health$1,374,810Human Services$216,000Housing & Shelter$170,000Education$70,900Food & Nutrition$54,000Community Improvement$20,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADA: $3,541,830 over 5y, 81% of budgetEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,470,957 over 5y, 12% of budgetBECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,390,216 over 3y, 34% of budgetCOMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC: $799,310 over 7y, 80% of budgetTEAM TYMAN LOVE LEGACY CORP: $260,000 over 7y, 80% of budgetADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC: $185,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $170,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetOKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetSOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetLighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers: $72,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMcCalls Chapel School Inc: $63,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED: $54,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetChickasaw Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget22nd Judicial District CASA Inc: $7,400 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHOUSE OF HOPE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADA ↗
  • Who funds EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM TYMAN LOVE LEGACY CORP ↗
  • Who funds ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers ↗
  • Who funds McCalls Chapel School Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Chickasaw Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
  • Who funds 22nd Judicial District CASA Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation Inc · Texoma Community Foundation · Ada Regional United Way Inc · Because We Care Philanthropy Inc · Rural Oklahoma Community Foundation Inc an Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Merrick Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valley View Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valley View Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Valley View Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Valley View Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valley View’s filings →

More from the funding graph