· Private foundation
Valley View Foundation Inc
DEVELOP AND SUPPORT PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES THAT PROMOTE AND IMPROVE THE HEALTH AND WELLNESS OF THE RESIDENTS OF ADA, OK AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $108k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
- $250k+2 grants · $544k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADA COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER | $294,364 |
| PONTOTOC TECHNOLOGY CENTER | $250,000 |
| COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC | $80,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| TEAM TYMAN LOVE LEGACY CORP | $40,000 |
| ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER | $30,000 |
| CHICKASAW NATION FOUNDATION | $28,069 |
| INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +139% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADA5× · 2018–2022 · $3.5M · revenue +1% · 81% of their budget
- ECEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +573%
- COCOMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $799k · revenue +291% · 80% of their budget
Funded once
- COCITY OF ADAone grant, 2019 · $212k
- CACALL A RIDEone grant, 2019 · $150k
- SOSOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The western oklahoma family care center show's god's love by helping families in western oklahoma overcome barrier in their lives in order to help them become contributinng self-supporting citizens
To restore the oral health of low-income, uninsured elderly and developmentally disabled oklahomans by providing free dental care to Oklahomans.
Oklahoma pregnancy care network is committed to assisting pregnant women and their families in need of compassionate, practical, and life affirming alternatives to abortion.
We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.
Provide free dental services, preventive dental education, and free oral/dental health care supplies to economically disadvantaged, dentally challenged disabled or elderly individuals, and/or vulnerable populations of eastern oklahoma.
Fosters an awareness of the obligations and responsibilities of the dental profession to society, to help advance the art and science of dentistry, and to promote public health and health services in the state of oklahoma.
The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…
As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.
The organization is an advocacy and member organization that helps lead the movement to ensure that all residents in oklahoma flourish in safe, afordable homes and the helps communities develope safe and afordable housing options.
To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.
Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Ada and the most unlike its peers is Abba's Tables Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ADA ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BECAUSE WE CARE PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM TYMAN LOVE LEGACY CORP ↗
- Who funds ADA SENIOR CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ADA HOMELESS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OKLA ADDICTION RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers ↗
- Who funds McCalls Chapel School Inc ↗
- Who funds ABBA'S TABLES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC ↗
- Who funds Chickasaw Foundation ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
- Who funds 22nd Judicial District CASA Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Southern Oklahoma Memorial Foundation Inc · Texoma Community Foundation · Ada Regional United Way Inc · Because We Care Philanthropy Inc · Rural Oklahoma Community Foundation Inc an Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Merrick Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Valley View Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Valley View Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Valley View Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.