· Private foundation
Uw Harry S Black & Allon Fuller
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CTR | $30,000 |
| ADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| RICHMOND UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| ALLIANCE OF RESIDENT THEATRES (ART) | $20,000 |
| SEARCH AND CARE | $15,000 |
| LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS | $10,000 |
| ST BERNARD HOSPITAL & HEALTH | $10,000 |
| ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD INITITATIVES | $10,000 |
| PARKINSON'S DISEASE FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| CITY SCHOOLS SPORTS ASSOCIATION | $7,500 |
| LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER | $6,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $5,000 |
| MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT | $5,000 |
| CENTER ON HALSTED | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +45%
SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC3× · 2020–2022 · $45k · revenue +177%- TDTHEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PRACTICE INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
- FOFRIENDS OF HARLEM HOSPITALone grant, 2021 · $20k
- TDTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INCone grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Heartland alliance health's mission is to transform healthcare for the most vulnerable, particularly people experiencing homelessness, mental illness or addictions, or struggling with multiple chronic illnesses, improving health for all…
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.
Sinai health system's mission is to improve the health of the individuals and communities it serves.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
Housing works services inc. is a federally qualified health care center (fqhc) providing a broad range of health services to persons living with aids, hiv-related illnesses and chronic diseases. in addition, housing works services inc.…
To improve the health status of patients and the residents living in the communities surrounding the organization's delivery sites through an organized, comprehensive program of primary care delivery, health education and health-related…
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds THEATRE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND SENSE ↗
- Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
- Who funds BETANCES HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Chicago Commons Association ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PRACTICE INC ↗
- Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
- Who funds THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PrimeCare Community Health Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Almost Home Kids ↗
- Who funds Center on Halsted ↗
- Who funds THE BOULEVARD OF CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds McDermott Center ↗
- Who funds Maryville Academy ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HEARING AND SPEECH RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Social Services Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · AIDS Foundation of Chicago · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Washington Square Health Foundation · Grant Hospital of Chicago D/B/A Grant Healthcare Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Uw Harry S Black & Allon Fuller funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.