Skip to content
Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council

The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership.

$764k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$138k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.1MCrime & Legal$190kCommunity Improvement$129kHealth$84k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $642,804, the rows itemized in this filing. The $763,824 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $121,020 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $378k
$28,272
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES$138,042
WASATCH FORENSIC NURSES$96,645
NORTHERN UTAH SEXUAL ASSAULT$92,500
SAFE HARBOR$50,357
HOLDING OUT HELP$38,176
CHERISH FAMILIES$33,004
PIK2AR$31,129
YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$28,272
HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES$25,800
NEW HOPE CRISIS CENTER$24,689
PEACE HOUSE INC$23,467
SOUTHWEST FORENSIC NURSING AND$21,250
DOVE CENTER$17,108
YWCA$13,728
FRIENDS AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE$8,637
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $977k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PEACE HOUSE INC: $23k → 5%SAFE HARBOR: $110k → 6%NORTHERN UTAH SEXUAL ASSAULT: $93k → 9%SEEKHAVEN INC: $36k → 11%CANYON CREEK SERVICES: $17k → 13%PEACE HOUSE INC: $15k → 5%SAFE HARBOR: $50k → 6%SEEKHAVEN INC: $30k → 11%CANYON CREEK SERVICES: $6k → 13%PEACE HOUSE INC: $9k → 5%SAFE HARBOR: $18k → 6%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $28k → 9%SEEKHAVEN INC: $22k → 11%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $18k → 9%SEEKHAVEN INC: $12k → 11%UTAH CRIME VICTIMS LEGAL CLINIC: $7k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES: $138k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES: $94k → 8%SOUH VALLEY SERVICES: $58k → 8%HOLDING OUT HELP: $38k → 8%SOUH VALLEY SERVICES: $38k → 8%HOLDING OUT HELP: $13k → 8%SOUH VALLEY SERVICES: $35k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $43k → 8%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $7k → 8%SOAP2HOPE: $13k → 8%SOAP2HOPE: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 18 repeat orgs$346k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
10

Total granted

$1.8M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+65%

Still filing today

89%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $219k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $363k · revenue +93%
  • YW
    Young Women's Christian Association of Utah
    6× · 2020–2025 · $247k · revenue +39%
  • CF
    Cherish Families
    5× · 2021–2025 · $162k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • AO
    ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • PR
    PRINCIPLE RIGHTS COALITION
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
2
Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council

The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership. the organization is the nationally recognized domestic violence coalition for the state of utah.

Crime & Legal
3
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
4
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
5
Hush No More

We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.

Health
6
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
7
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
8
Community Beyond Violence

CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

—
9
Family Crisis Centers Inc

Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.

Human Services
10
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
11
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
12
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Children in Crisis; the most unlike its peers is Northern Utah Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $362,886 · Human ServicesSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INCSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $177,801 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTERSEEKHAVEN FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $100,822 · Human ServicesSEEKHAVEN FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCNORTHERN UTAH SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAMINERS: $92,500 · Human ServicesNORTHERN UTAH SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAMINERSHolding Out HELP: $51,076 · Human ServicesASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $49,665 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc: $46,588 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $46,452 · Human Services+3 more: $49,275 · Human ServicesYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $246,875 · OtherYoung Women's Christian Associati…PACIFIC ISLAND KNOWLEDGE 2 ACTION RESOURCES INC: $190,388 · OtherPACIFIC ISLAND KNOWLEDGE 2 ACTION…New Hope Crisis Center of Box Elder County: $54,173 · OtherNew Hope Crisis Center of Box Eld…OGDEN CITY - CARES GRANTS: $41,100 · OtherOGDEN CITY - CARES GRANTSADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS: $24,327 · OtherPRINCIPLE RIGHTS COALITION: $21,897 · Other+6 more: $64,534 · Other+6 moreHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $99,787 · HealthHoly Cross Mi…WASATCH FORENSIC NURSES INC: $96,645 · HealthWASATCH FOREN…The Center for Women and Children in Crisis: $29,137 · HealthThe Center fo…SOUTHWEST FORENSIC NURSING & HEALTHCARE: $21,250 · HealthSOUTHWEST FOR…UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $9,676 · Health+1 more: $8,637 · HealthCherish Families: $162,264 · Community ImprovementDOVE CENTER INC: $86,887 · Housing & ShelterJOURNEY OF HOPE INC: $48,664 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$977,065Other$643,294Health$265,132Community Improvement$162,264Housing & Shelter$86,887Crime & Legal$48,664

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $362,886 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $246,875 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER: $177,801 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCherish Families: $162,264 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSEEKHAVEN FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $100,822 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $99,787 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDOVE CENTER INC: $86,887 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNew Hope Crisis Center of Box Elder County: $54,173 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHolding Out HELP: $51,076 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $49,665 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJOURNEY OF HOPE INC: $48,664 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPeace House Inc: $46,588 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $46,452 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis: $29,137 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $22,725 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSOAP2HOPE: $19,550 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetUTAH CRIME VICTIM LEGAL CLINIC INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ihc Health Services I…Sorenson Legacy Found…George S and Dolores …Intermountain Communi…Dominion Energy Chari…Utah's PromiseLarry H Miller and Ga…C Scott & Dorothy E W…The Community Foundat…Hemingway FoundationUtah Medical Associat…Thom & Gail Williamse…
Ihc Health Services IncUT32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Utah's Promise · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Hemingway Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home