· Public charity
Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council
The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $519,477 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $625,518 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $106,041 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $338k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES | $93,594 |
| PIK2AR | $56,029 |
| JOURNEY OF HOPE INC | $41,087 |
| SEEKHAVEN INC | $36,450 |
| HOLY CROSS MINISTRIES | $32,050 |
| OGDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT | $31,950 |
| CHERISH FAMILIES | $29,288 |
| YWCA | $27,478 |
| THE DOVE CENTER | $26,755 |
| ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS | $24,327 |
| YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER | $18,180 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| WEST VALLEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT | $13,450 |
| SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT | $13,200 |
| SOAP2HOPE | $13,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $606k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YWYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah5× · 2020–2024 · $233k · revenue +39%
- SVSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $225k · revenue +93%
- CFCherish Families4× · 2021–2024 · $129k · revenue +114%
Funded once
- PRPRINCIPLE RIGHTS COALITIONone grant, 2021 · $22k
- UNUTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +48%
- UCUTAH CRIME VICTIM LEGAL CLINIC INCone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership. the organization is the nationally recognized domestic violence coalition for the state of utah.
The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…
Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.
We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…
CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.
Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.
Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…
The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Children in Crisis and the most unlike its peers is Northern Utah Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
- Who funds SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds Cherish Families ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEEKHAVEN FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Holy Cross Ministries of Utah ↗
- Who funds DOVE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds New Hope Crisis Center of Box Elder County ↗
- Who funds The Center for Women and Children in Crisis ↗
- Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
- Who funds CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOAP2HOPE ↗
- Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Holding Out HELP ↗
- Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH CRIME VICTIM LEGAL CLINIC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Utah's Promise · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Hemingway Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.