Skip to content
US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership

The US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership strengthens and grows community philianthropy in the US-Mexico border region.

$1.4M
Granted FY2022
38
Grants FY2022
22
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

86% of US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership’s FY2024 grant dollars went to International Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership named its own grantees at scale: 37 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’18
0
’19
0
’20
2
’21
37
’22
1
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.8MInternational$563kPhilanthropy$392kHuman Services$257kEducation$215kCivil Rights$62kPublic Benefit$50kCommunity Improvement$31kOther$0
02FY2022 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 38 grants below total $1,326,029, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,381,882 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,853 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $983k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $341k
$31,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$733k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southeast Arizona Area Health Educ$93,000
Vision y Compromiso$93,000
Migrant Clinicians Network Inc$93,000
National Latina Inst for Reprod Justice$62,000
Emerson Diversity Health Foundation$31,000
Samuel U Rodgers Health Center Inc$31,000
United Way Kern County$31,000
Latino Community Fund Inc$31,000
El Zocalo Immigrant Resource Center$31,000
Research Education & Access$31,000
Children's Crisis Treatment Center Inc$31,000
El Centro Regional Medical Center$31,000
OneWorld Community Health$31,000
Area Health Education Center$31,000
Fundacion Latinoamericana de Accio$31,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Fiesta Educativa Inc: $31k → 14%Young Women's Christian Assoc: $31k → 16%Nothwest Family Services: $20k → 8%Alliance for Progress: $31k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
AR
NC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $269k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$269k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Program Service Assistance

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Comunidad De Colores

Our mission is to promote health equity in Northern New Mexico by improving quality and access to health services regardless of one's insurance status or ability to pay.

Health
2
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
3
Clinicas De Salud Del Pueblo Inc

Clinicas is the safety net provider for Imperial and Eastern Riverside Counties providing primary health care to low income and medically under served populations. We provide comprehensive, preventative and treatment services, pediatric,…

Health
4
Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno

Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.

International
5
Latinos Salud Inc

Latinos Salud exists to provide client-centered, culturally competent health education and integrated preventive, screening, and healthcare services throughout South Florida to reduce the burden of communicable diseases and improve health…

Education
6
Center for Multicutural Health

Our mission is to promote the health and wellbeing of diverse communities through innovative health advocacy, health promotion, disease prevention, and immigrant and refugee service programs.

—
7
Vuela for Health

Vuelas mission is to unite and engage Latino communities through education, collaboration, and leadership development, to improve the physical, mental, social, and emotional well-being of participants and their families.

Community Improvement
8
The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services

La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.

—
9
La Maestra Family Clinic Inc

To provide compassionate, complete healthcare to the communities we are privileged to serve. During the fiscal year, we provided services to over 48,000 patients and 216,000 visits.

Health
10
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…

—
11
Sacred Valley Health

To promote health in the underserved rural communities of Peru's Sacred Valley.

International
12
Chico Feminist Womens Health Center dba Womens Health Specialists

Womens Health Specialists vision is a world where women control their own bodies,reproduction, and sexuality. The center is dedicated to providing women-controlledhealth care for all women.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Centro Hispano Inc; the most unlike its peers is Create Purpose Worldwide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
25/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

US-Mexico Border Health Coalition: $876,039 · OtherUS-Mexico Border Health CoalitionUS Mexico Border Health Commission: $193,400 · OtherUS Mexico Border Health Commission+16 more: $348,904 · Other+16 moreINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $827,703 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $79,700 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHER…+4 more: $93,288 · Philanthropy+4 moreSOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH: $93,000 · HealthSOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA …MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC: $93,000 · HealthMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETW…NATIONAL LATINA INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $62,000 · HealthNATIONAL LATINA INSTITU…HEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL: $31,000 · HealthSt Luke's Health System Ltd: $31,000 · HealthEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $31,000 · HealthEMERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $31,000 · HealthALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $31,000 · HealthFUNDACION LATINOAMERICANA DE ACCION SOCIAL INC: $31,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER: $31,000 · HealthSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC: $31,000 · HealthLATIN COMMUNITY ADVISORS INC: $31,000 · HealthAREA HEALTH ED CNTR MID RIO GRANDE BORDER AREA OF TEXAS INC: $31,000 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $31,000 · HealthMARSONI FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $31,000 · HealthRESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACCESS TO CO: $31,000 · HealthSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $31,000 · HealthVISION Y COMPROMISO: $93,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE PROTOCOL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $31,000 · Human ServicesFIESTA EDUCATIVA INC: $31,000 · Human ServicesAlliance For Progress: $31,000 · Human ServicesComunidades Unidas: $20,000 · Human ServicesEL ZOCALO IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $31,000 · InternationalUS-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership: $23,889 · InternationalCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC: $31,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,418,343Philanthropy$1,000,691Health$713,000Education$143,000Human Services$113,000International$54,889Arts & Culture$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $827,703 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH: $93,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC: $93,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO: $93,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $79,700 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL LATINA INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $62,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PROTOCOL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL: $31,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc: $31,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRO MULTICULTURAL LA FAMILIA INC: $31,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Luke's Health System Ltd: $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $31,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFIESTA EDUCATIVA INC: $31,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCampesinos Sin Fronteras: $31,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL ZOCALO IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER: $31,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $31,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUNDACION LATINOAMERICANA DE ACCION SOCIAL INC: $31,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER: $31,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATIN COMMUNITY ADVISORS INC: $31,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetAREA HEALTH ED CNTR MID RIO GRANDE BORDER AREA OF TEXAS INC: $31,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $31,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMARSONI FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetAlliance For Progress: $31,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLA RAZA SERVICES INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL EASTERN CALIFORNIA DBA UNITED WAY OF KERN COUNTY: $31,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLatino Community Fund Inc: $31,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACCESS TO CO: $31,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership: $23,889 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetComunidades Unidas: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $288 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hispanic Federation I…UnidosusDirect ReliefHispanics in Philanth…National Council on A…National Foundation f…Public Health Institu…New Venture FundNEO Philanthropy IncThe Chicago Community…The California Wellne…The California Endowm…
Hispanic Federation IncNY24.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · Unidosus · Direct Relief · Hispanics in Philanthropy · National Council on Aging Inc · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Public Health Institute · New Venture Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Northwest Family Services: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on US-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home