Skip to content
University Mound Old Ladies Home at a glance

· Private foundation

University Mound Old Ladies Home

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$812kHealth$500kHousing & Shelter$470kCivil Rights$125kFood & Nutrition$120k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Francis Living Room$100,000
Senior Disability Action$25,000
Community Living Campaign$25,000
Openhouse$20,000
Older Women's League$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $620k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Institute on Aging: $50k → 10%Steppingstone: $100k → 10%Steppingstone: $100k → 10%SteppingStone: $75k → 10%SteppingStone: $75k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $50k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $50k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $25k → 10%Curry Senior Center: $20k → 10%Southwest Community Corporation: $50k → 10%Kimochi: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 8 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$1.8M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O
    Openhouse
    5× · 2020–2024 · $470k · revenue +26%
  • NA
    NORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $350k · revenue +98%
  • SF
    St Francis Living Room
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +139% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • IO
    INSTITUTE ON AGINGgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +51%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Ladies Protection and Relief Society
Health
2
City Hope San Francisco

In the tenderloin, we provide a trusted gathering place and creatively offer as many elements of home possible for our neighbors.

Human Services
3
Family Bridges Inc

We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.

—
4
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
5
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
6
Pilipino Senior Resource Center

The organization's mission is to provide comprehensive quality services for seniors and their families in the south of market area of san francisco, california and other neighborhoods.

Human Services
7
Rafiki Coalition for Health and Wellness

We envision a San Francisco where communities can access coordinated, culturally affirming whole-person care through trusted, community-rooted systems-leading to longer lives, stronger prevention, and reduced avoidable health related harm.

Health
8
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
9
Senior Network Services Inc

Senior Network Services is a nonprofit agency providing senior citizens and persons with disabilities with information, guidance and assistance in coordinating existing resources to promote independence and the highest quality of life.

Human Services
10
Asian Community Center of Sacramento Valley Inc Dba Acc Senior Services

The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…

Health
11
Coalition of Agencies Serving the Elderly

The Coalition of Agencies Serving the Elderly (CASE) engages the provider community in advocacy efforts to inform and influence public policy to sustain and enhance services for seniors and adults with disabilities. CASE is a public voice…

—
12
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Openhouse; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Community Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION: $350,000 · Human ServicesNORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DA…CURRY SENIOR CENTER: $145,000 · Human ServicesCURRY SENIOR CENTERINSTITUTE ON AGING: $50,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE ON AGINGSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATIONKIMOCHI INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesOpenhouse: $470,000 · Housing & ShelterOpenhouseSenior Disability Action: $150,000 · OtherSenior Disability Actio…San Francisco Senior and Disability Action DBA Senior & Disability Action: $125,000 · OtherSan Francisco Senior an…Older Women's League: $67,000 · OtherOlder Women's LeagueSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $35,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKMeals on Wheels: $35,000 · OtherMeals on WheelsSt Francis Living Room: $300,000 · Food & NutritionSt Francis Livin…Community Living Campaign: $225,000 · Civil RightsCommunity Li…
Human Services$620,000Housing & Shelter$470,000Other$412,000Food & Nutrition$300,000Civil Rights$225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOpenhouse: $470,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetNORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION: $350,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSt Francis Living Room: $300,000 over 4y, 69% of budgetCommunity Living Campaign: $225,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCURRY SENIOR CENTER: $145,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSan Francisco Senior and Disability Action DBA Senior & Disability Action: $125,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIMOCHI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Metta FundMcNabb FoundationTouchpoint Foundation…The Joseph and Vera L…The San Francisco Fou…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Metta FundCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Metta Fund · McNabb Foundation · Touchpoint Foundation - Host · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University Mound Old Ladies Home funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University Mound Old Ladies Home. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on University Mound Old Ladies Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home