· Public charity
United Way of Rock River Valley
Uniting the collective power of the community to improve lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $421k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $499k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YWCA OF ROCKFORD | $120,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROCKFORD | $71,355 |
| ZION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $57,538 |
| YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY | $50,075 |
| BELVIDERE FAMILY YMCA | $50,000 |
| NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY LIFE CENTER | $50,000 |
| BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE | $50,000 |
| ETHNIC HERITAGE | $43,403 |
| LIFESCRAP COMMUNITY SERVICES | $42,916 |
| OTHER | $41,632 |
| AFRICAN-AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER | $40,000 |
| ALIGNMENT ROCKFORD | $30,000 |
| IWBC | $30,000 |
| WINNEBAGO OFFICE OF EDUCATORS | $28,211 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YSYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC6× · 2017–2022 · $801k · revenue +144%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD8× · 2017–2025 · $700k · revenue +123%
- DCDISCOVERY CENTER MUSEUM OF ROCKFORD INC7× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- NINorthern Illinois Center for Nonprofit Excellenceone grant, 2021 · $81k · revenue +15%
- JDJEREMIAH DEVELOPMENT NFPone grant, 2021 · $62k · revenue -8%
- NSNORTH SUBURBAN LIBRARY DISTRICTone grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of this corporation to provide quality care for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years whose parents are employed or in training.
Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.
Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.
Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible, child care in a developmentally appropriate learning environment. the program is committed to the holistic development of the individual child through a broad range of educational programs, which…
Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…
The rockford area economic development council cultivates opportunities for primary job growth that increase the economic well-being of our region
To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…
The organization provides low income affordable housing under illinois housing development authority guidelines.
To assist children who have been victims of abuse
Residential rehabilitation for mentally and emotionally disabled adults.
To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roy Gayle Pony Baseball Softball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY CENTER MUSEUM OF ROCKFORD INC ↗
- Who funds ZION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ANGELIC ORGANICS LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES ↗
- Who funds KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds ROCKFORD SEXUAL ASSAULT COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds PATRIOTS' GATEWAY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Blackhawk Learning Connection ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LYDIA HOME ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE OF OGLE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES OF NO IL ↗
- Who funds SHELTER CARE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FOCUS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ROCK RIVER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SERENITY HOSPICE AND HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · The Ben Harding Family Foundation · The Mill Foundation · Blazer Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Guy Reno Family Foundation · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · Ralph J Baudhuin Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Rock River Valley funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.