Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$244kYouth Development$235kRecreation & Sports$83kHousing & Shelter$68kCommunity Improvement$57kArts & Culture$38kFood & Nutrition$30kReligion$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$10,000
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
PATRIOTS' GATEWAY COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
ROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION$10,000
CASA OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY$10,000
THE MUSIC ACADEMY OF ROCKFORD$9,000
NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$8,900
DISCOVERY CENTER MUSEUM$8,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$8,000
REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES$8,000
ROCKFORD BARBELL$7,200
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL$7,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,000
KEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER$3,600
YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK: $14k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $27k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $15k → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $13k → 15%YMCA - OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC: $8k → 15%YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $3k → 15%CARPENTER'S PLACE: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$778k · 24 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$778k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

71%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PATRIOTS' GATEWAY COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +92%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD
    3× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +91%
  • WC
    WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA
    3× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +303%

Funded once

  • CS
    CHILDREN'S SAFE HARBOR INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • RP
    ROCKFORD PARK DISTRICT - WASHINGTON PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • LD
    LIFE DECISIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +105%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rockford Regional Health Council

Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

2
Transform Rockford
Community Improvement
3
Rock Rapids Kids Club Inc

To provide nurturing and educational childcare services.

Human Services
4
Stepping Stones of Rockford Inc

Residential rehabilitation for mentally and emotionally disabled adults.

Human Services
5
Rockford Christian Education Association

To challenge young people to know christ as lord, apply god's truth in all areas of life, love others sacrifically, and achieve the highest level of knowledge and skill in order to serve god and others

Education
6
Rockford Day Nursery

It is the mission of this corporation to provide quality care for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years whose parents are employed or in training.

Human Services
7
Rockford Community Service Center

North kent connect is a christian organization committed to improving the lives of all people in northern kent county by providing access to basic needs and promoting economic independence.

Human Services
8
Rocksolid Community Teen Center

Provide a safe place for youth in the community to foster relationships with one another and become caring adults

Youth Development
9
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
10
Community Action Inc of Rock & Walworth Counties

At community action we provide access and opportunity for those we serve and those who support our efforts. through innovative programs and strong community partnerships we eliminate barriers, establishing clear pathways to economic…

Community Improvement
11
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
12
The Rockford Institute

To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Life Decisions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health & Social S…Community Museums & GardensRockford Community Organiza…Community Recreation & Serv…Rockford Community Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr13%9%5–10yr15%18%10–20yr14%9%20–35yr15%23%35–55yr24%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%8%<5yr13%3%5–10yr15%8%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr15%17%35–55yr24%49%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
10%
119/1,237

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER — $89,500 · OtherNORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTERBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD — $54,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORDNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $46,930 · OtherNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPBOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $33,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBCASA OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY — $33,089 · OtherCASA OF WINNEBAGO COUNTYBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $32,250 · OtherBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INCKEEPING FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER-KFACT — $27,500 · OtherKEEPING FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES TOGETHER-KFACTCHILDREN'S HOME & AID - NORTHERN REGION — $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $16,600 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $27,000 · OtherNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANKDISCOVERY CENTER MUSEUM OF ROCKFORD INC — $24,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $20,300 · Other+8 more — $67,350 · Other+8 moreWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA — $54,500 · Human ServicesWINNEBAGO CO…YOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVIC…YMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $13,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF ROCK…+1 more — $2,365 · Human ServicesPATRIOTS' GATEWAY COMMUNITY CENTER — $82,800 · Recreation & SportsPATRIOTS' G…Rockford Barbell — $7,200 · Recreation & SportsRockford Ba…REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES — $28,226 · HealthTHE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD — $12,500 · HealthROCKFORD SEXUAL ASSAULT COUNSELING INC — $6,750 · HealthHOPE REIGNS RANCH — $4,160 · HealthROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES — $48,700 · EducationROCKFORD PROMISE — $2,500 · EducationROCK HOUSE KIDS — $28,171 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE DECISIONS INC — $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentKEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $33,560 · Community Improvement
Other$492,519Human Services$91,365Recreation & Sports$90,000Health$51,636Education$51,200Youth Development$43,671Community Improvement$33,560

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST COMMUNITY CENTER — $89,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPATRIOTS' GATEWAY COMMUNITY CENTER — $82,800 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD — $54,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA — $54,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES — $48,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKEN-ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $33,560 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $32,250 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES — $28,226 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetROCK HOUSE KIDS — $28,171 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY CENTER MUSEUM OF ROCKFORD INC — $24,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES NETWORK INC — $21,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $20,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYMCA OF ROCK RIVER VALLEY — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKFORD — $12,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S SAFE HARBOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLIFE DECISIONS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTHE LITERACY COUNCIL — $8,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRockford Barbell — $7,200 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetROCKFORD SEXUAL ASSAULT COUNSELING INC — $6,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE REIGNS RANCH — $4,160 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetROCKFORD PROMISE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCARPENTER'S PLACE INC — $2,365 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL47.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · The Kjellstrom Family Foundation · United Way of Rock River Valley · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · Ralph J Baudhuin Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Guy Reno Family Foundation · Ahlstrand Family Foundation · SwedishAmerican Health Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mill Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Mill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph