Skip to content
United Way of Randolph County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Randolph County Inc

To mobilize and unite people, partners, and nonprofits to improve lives across our communities in randolph county.

$298k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.7MRecreation & Sports$379kHealth$366kYouth Development$341kEducation$249kPublic Safety & Disaster$227kCrime & Legal$67k
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $291,065, the rows itemized in this filing. The $298,361 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,296 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$19,985
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANDOLPH SENIOR ADULTS ASSOCIATION$93,440
CHRISTIANS UNITED OUTREACH CENTER$45,002
REGIONAL CONSOLIDATED SERVICES$24,875
RANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN$21,033
ASH-RAND RESCUE SQUAD AND EMS$20,275
YMCA ASHEBORORANDOLPH$19,985
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HIGH POINT$15,588
KINTEGRA HEALTH$12,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$11,382
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,075
SALVATION ARMY$9,970
4-H$7,440
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%American Red Cross: $12k → 14%American Red Cross: $11k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $11k → 14%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%American Red Cross: $9k → 14%American Red Cross: $8k → 14%American Red Cross: $8k → 14%American Red Cross: $8k → 14%American Red Cross: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 18 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
0

Total granted

$3.7M
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RS
    RANDOLPH SENIOR ADULTS ASSOCIATION INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $1.0M · revenue +42%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC RANDOLPH-ASHEBORO
    10× · 2017–2026 · $399k · revenue +33%
  • RC
    RANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $270k · revenue +18%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Randolph County Health Department

    To provide quality services to protect maintain and enhance community well-being by promoting conditions in which people can achieve their maximum level of health

    Health
    2
    Randolph Hospital Inc

    Randolph hospital's mission is to provide quality health care and to foster health and wellness in our communities.

    —
    3
    Roanoke Chowan Community Health Center

    Great Care for every one, every day.

    Health
    4
    Randolph Regional Ems Corporation

    The mission of Randolph Regional EMS Corporation is to provide the best Emergency care possible servicing our community better.

    Health
    5
    North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc

    To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.

    Health
    6
    Cumberland Medical Center

    Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

    Health
    7
    Randolph Specialty Group Practice

    The mission of randolph specialty group is to provide timely, convenient access to a broad range of quality medical services.

    —
    8
    Randolph County Ymca Inc

    The randolph county ymca is a charitable human and community service organization that includes children, teens, women and men, and does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, or national origin. the mission of the ymca is…

    —
    9
    Roanoke Valley Rescue Squad Inc

    Provide emergency medical services, emergency medical trasportation, and search and rescue of missing persons.

    Health
    10
    Roane County Medical Center

    Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

    Health
    11
    Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

    Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

    —
    12
    Girl Scouts - North Carolina Coastal Pines Inc

    Building girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

    Youth Development
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association Inc Randolph-Asheboro; the most unlike its peers is Christians United Outreach Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    15/15
    Grantees still filing
    11/15
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    RANDOLPH SENIOR ADULTS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,033,903 · Human ServicesRANDOLPH SENIOR ADULTS ASSOCIATION INCCHRISTIANS UNITED OUTREACH CENTER: $425,251 · Human ServicesCHRISTIANS UNITED OUTREACH CENTERRandolph County Family Crisis Center Inc: $100,098 · Human ServicesRandolph County Family Crisis Center IncAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $89,917 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapt…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC RANDOLPH-ASHEBORO: $398,516 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC…RANDOLPH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $275,926 · OtherRANDOLPH COMMUNITY SERVICES INCMed Resource Ctr for Randolph Co: $238,163 · OtherMed Resource Ctr for Randolph CoRandolph Fellowship Homes - Alpha House & Mangum House: $198,195 · OtherRandolph Fellowship Homes - Alpha Hou…4-H: $50,485 · Other+2 more: $38,137 · OtherRANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $269,931 · EducationRANDOLPH C…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY: $82,712 · EducationCOMMUNITIE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER TRIAD Inc: $154,811 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC: $52,189 · Youth DevelopmentOld North State Council Inc: $35,572 · Youth DevelopmentASH-RAND RESCUE SQUAD & EMS INC: $167,297 · HealthLEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $52,004 · Crime & Legal
    Human Services$1,649,169Other$1,199,422Education$352,643Youth Development$242,572Health$167,297Crime & Legal$52,004

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRANDOLPH SENIOR ADULTS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,033,903 over 10y, 4.8% of budgetCHRISTIANS UNITED OUTREACH CENTER: $425,251 over 10y, 2.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC RANDOLPH-ASHEBORO: $398,516 over 10y, 2.8% of budgetRANDOLPH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $275,926 over 10y, 0.5% of budgetRANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $269,931 over 10y, 1.4% of budgetMed Resource Ctr for Randolph Co: $238,163 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetASH-RAND RESCUE SQUAD & EMS INC: $167,297 over 10y, 3.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER TRIAD Inc: $154,811 over 10y, 2.3% of budgetRandolph County Family Crisis Center Inc: $100,098 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $89,917 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY: $82,712 over 10y, 2.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC: $52,189 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $52,004 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOld North State Council Inc: $35,572 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds RANDOLPH SENIOR ADULTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
    • Who funds CHRISTIANS UNITED OUTREACH CENTER ↗
    • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC RANDOLPH-ASHEBORO ↗
    • Who funds RANDOLPH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds RANDOLPH COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
    • Who funds Med Resource Ctr for Randolph Co ↗
    • Who funds ASH-RAND RESCUE SQUAD & EMS INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER TRIAD Inc ↗
    • Who funds Randolph County Family Crisis Center Inc ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC ↗
    • Who funds LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
    • Who funds Old North State Council Inc ↗
    • Who funds GASTON FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Timken Foundation of …Duke Energy FoundationUnited Way of Greater…Reynolds American Fou…The Cannon Foundation…Foundation for the Ca…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Timken Foundation of CantonOH17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Timken Foundation of Canton · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greater High Point Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization United Way of Randolph County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Randolph County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on United Way of Randolph County’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home