Skip to content
United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties

To improve peoples lives by connecting the caring power of our communities.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.0MEducation$326kYouth Development$276kHealth$238kHousing & Shelter$75kReligion$62kEmployment$37kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $130,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $150,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$476k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE COALITION -HOUSING SUPPORT KIDS COUNT COMM CARE FUND$20,750
RED WING YOUTH OUTREACH$19,000
HISPANIC OUTREACH$17,500
CARE CLINIC$12,500
COMMONBOND$10,000
COLVILL KIDS PRESCHOOL$9,000
THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY INC$9,000
WABASHA-KELLOGG PUBLIC SCHOOLS$7,000
SEMCAC$6,500
HIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH$6,500
HOPE & HARBOR SHELTER$6,250
RISE UP RED WING$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SEMCAC - SENIOR DINING: $6k → 8%SEMCAC: $8k → 14%SEMCAC: $7k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $7k → 9%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $7k → 9%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $7k → 9%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $7k → 9%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 21 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$2.0M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+71%

Still filing today

48%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOPE COALITION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $487k · revenue +35%
  • RP
    RISEUP PARTNERSHIP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $276k · revenue +304%
  • CA
    C A R E Clinic
    9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +500%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2023 · $60k
  • FF
    FERNBROOK FARMS
    2× · 2021–2023 · $18k
  • I2
    ISD 256
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mental Health Resources Inc

The mission of mental health resources is to foster hope, health and recovery for people affected by mental illness and substance use disorder.

—
2
Youthlink

To be a community in which all youth, without regard to their living situation, have an equal opportunity to pursue and achieve their goals and dreams. the agency does this by supporting, resourcing, and empowering young people on their…

Human Services
3
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
4
United Community Action Partnership Inc

The mission of united community action partnership, inc. (ucap) is building stronger communities by providing opportunities that empower people in need.

Community Improvement
5
Greater Twin Cities United Way

For 110 years, greater twin cities united way (united way), a nonprofit, has demonstrated that whenever there's a community need in the greater twin cities region, united way is there. united way's efforts continually evolve to respond to…

Philanthropy
6
Darts

Darts creates connections that enrich aging. since 1974, darts has collaborated with diverse community partners to deliver services empowering older adults and caregivers, promote wellness, bolster financial stability, and foster ongoing…

Human Services
7
Canvas Health Inc

To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.

Human Services
8
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
9
Matrix Human Services

Inspired by its heritage since 1906, matrix human services advocates for and services the most vulnerable in the metropolitan detroit community and empowers individiuals and families to enhance the quality of their lives and achieve self…

—
10
Ucare Minnesota

Ucare will improve the health of our members through innovative services and partnerships across communities.

Health
11
Developmental Services of Northwest Kansas Inc

Dsnwk is committed to providing quality community-based services and support to adults and children with developmental disabilites from northwest kansas, regardless of the level of their disabilites.

Human Services
12
West Central Minnesota Communities Action Inc

Empowering people while providing services and resources that impact individuals and communities.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Three Rivers Community Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is C a R E Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HISPANIC OUTREACH: $205,788 · OtherHISPANIC OUTREACHTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $184,680 · OtherTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INCGOODHUE COUNTY EDUCATION DISTRICT # 6051: $101,830 · OtherGOODHUE COUNTY EDUCATION DISTRICT # 6051RED WING FAMILY YMCA: $75,063 · OtherRED WING FAMILY YMCAWABASHA-KELLOGG EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $67,638 · OtherWABASHA-KELLOGG EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONCOLVILL KIDS PRESCHOOL: $62,875 · OtherCOLVILL KIDS PRESCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherHIAWATHA BIBLE CHAPEL INC: $52,186 · OtherCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $44,250 · Other+22 more: $282,365 · Other+22 moreHOPE COALITION: $486,800 · Housing & ShelterHOPE COALITIONRISEUP PARTNERSHIP: $276,266 · Youth DevelopmentRISEUP PARTNER…C A R E Clinic: $222,500 · HealthC A R E Cli…FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $35,000 · Human ServicesSEMCAC: $20,500 · Human ServicesPROACT INC: $26,750 · EmploymentSOUTHEAST MINNESOTA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · EmploymentJESUS DRIVEN LLC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,136,675Housing & Shelter$486,800Youth Development$276,266Health$222,500Human Services$55,500Employment$36,750Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE COALITION: $486,800 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetRISEUP PARTNERSHIP: $276,266 over 9y, 15% of budgetC A R E Clinic: $222,500 over 9y, 8.0% of budgetTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $184,680 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetRED WING FAMILY YMCA: $75,063 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES: $44,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $35,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetPROACT INC: $26,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSEMCAC: $20,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $15,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJESUS DRIVEN LLC: $10,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSOUTHEAST MINNESOTA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSERVEMINNESOTA: $6,690 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRed Wing Arts Association: $6,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds RISEUP PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds C A R E Clinic ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds RED WING FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING ↗
  • Who funds PROACT INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMCAC ↗
  • Who funds HIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JESUS DRIVEN LLC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SERVEMINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Red Wing Arts Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jones Family Foun…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Xcel Energy FoundationRed Wing Shoe Company…Otto Bremer TrustSouthern Minnesota In…Givinga Foundation IncRochester Area Founda…Albrecht-Poss Family …Southeastern Minnesot…United Way of Southea…Winona Community Foun…
The Jones Family FoundationMN28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jones Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Red Wing Shoe Company Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation · Givinga Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Foundation · Albrecht-Poss Family Foundation · Southeastern Minnesota Area Agency on Aging Inc · United Way of Southeast Minnesota · Winona Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home