Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Southeastern Minnesota Area Agency on Aging Inc

To help older adults age successfully while maintaining their dignity and independence in the community through informed choices.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$16MHealth$1.4MCrime & Legal$686kSocial Science$566kRecreation & Sports$356kOther$2.8M
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $551k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.1M
$86,961
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEMCAC INC$2,383,537
THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC$435,671
ELDER NETWORK$286,765
FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC$149,236
MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC$93,312
LACRESCENT AREA HEALTHY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP$86,961
SOUTHERN MINNESOTA REGIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC$84,810
SENIOR RESOURCES OF FREEBORN COUNTY$75,210
CITY OF WINONA$61,120
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN$35,482
FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING$30,026
WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY$26,341
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $16.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SEMCAC INC: $2.4M → 8%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $93k → 10%SEMCAC INC: $2.2M → 8%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $74k → 10%SEMCAC INC: $2.1M → 8%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $70k → 10%SEMCAC INC: $2.1M → 8%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $66k → 10%SEMCAC INC: $2.0M → 8%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $149k → 9%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $60k → 10%SEMCAC INC: $1.4M → 8%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $149k → 9%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $60k → 10%SEMCAC INC: $1.3M → 8%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $52k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $35k → 14%SEMCAC INC: $1.2M → 8%MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC: $51k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $34k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $30k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $32k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $30k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $97k → 9%FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING: $25k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $30k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $85k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $29k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $83k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $20k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN MN: $28k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $13k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 13 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$22M
$39k

Still filing today

77%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalSocial ScienceRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SEMCAC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +53%
  • TR
    THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +163%
  • EN
    ELDER NETWORK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +75% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • LC
    LA CRESCENT DINING
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • PI
    PRAIRIE ISLAND INDIAN COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2021 · $14k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Community Services

Our mission is empowering people as they age.

Human Services
2
Darts

Darts creates connections that enrich aging. since 1974, darts has collaborated with diverse community partners to deliver services empowering older adults and caregivers, promote wellness, bolster financial stability, and foster ongoing…

Human Services
3
Licking Valley Community Action Program

Assist low income, handicapped and elderly clients.

Human Services
4
United Community Action Partnership Inc

The mission of united community action partnership, inc. (ucap) is building stronger communities by providing opportunities that empower people in need.

Community Improvement
5
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
6
Eldercircle

Empower older adults to maintain active living & healthy independence by providing services, resources & referrals so they may remain in their homes longer

Human Services
7
Tri-County Action Program Inc

The intent of the agency's mission is to enhance and expand opportunities for the economic and social well-being of low- and moderate-income households and, in some cases, the general public. resources to provide services are funded…

Human Services
8
Aging Disability & Transit Services

To enhance the quality of life for all rockingham county citizens, with primary focus on senior adults, people with disabilities, and their families.

9
Aging Resources of Central Iowa

The mission of aging resources of central iowa is to lead, advocate, and serve; as well as plan and coordinate resources in the provision of services to older persons in central iowa, their families, caregivers, or representatives,…

Human Services
10
Wright County Community Action Inc

Working in partnership with the community to empower residents to improve their physical, social and economic well-being. we work to alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty.

Human Services
11
Central Minnesota Council On Aging Inc

The central minnesota council on aging is committed to maintaining the highest level of independence with older people by developing and coordinating community care, reducing isolation and improving access to services.

Human Services
12
Senior Services of Central Illinois

To support and serve seniors with non-medical services and to promote independent living and enrich quality of life.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Three Rivers Community Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is La Crescent Area Hcp Healthy Community Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEMCAC — $14,557,364 · Human ServicesSEMCACFAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC — $609,300 · Human Services+3 more — $799,065 · Human ServicesTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $2,292,593 · OtherTHREE RIVERS C…CITY OF WINONA — $307,496 · OtherCITY OF WINONAFOND DU LAC TRIBAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $102,573 · Other+3 more — $113,477 · OtherELDER NETWORK — $1,369,811 · HealthSOUTHERN MN REGIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC — $686,471 · Crime & LegalSENIOR RESOURCES OF FREEBORN COUNTY — $566,098 · Social ScienceLA CRESCENT AREA HCP HEALTHY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $355,739 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$15,965,729Other$2,816,139Health$1,369,811Crime & Legal$686,471Social Science$566,098Recreation & Sports$355,739

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEMCAC — $14,557,364 over 8y, 15% of budgetTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $2,292,593 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetELDER NETWORK — $1,369,811 over 8y, 30% of budgetSOUTHERN MN REGIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC — $686,471 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC — $609,300 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES OF FREEBORN COUNTY — $566,098 over 8y, 45% of budgetMOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC — $526,273 over 8y, 11% of budgetLA CRESCENT AREA HCP HEALTHY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $355,739 over 8y, 17% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER — $217,766 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING — $55,026 over 2y, 26% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEMCAC
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds ELDER NETWORK
  • Who funds SOUTHERN MN REGIONAL LEGAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC
  • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES OF FREEBORN COUNTY
  • Who funds MOWER COUNTY SENIORS INC
  • Who funds LA CRESCENT AREA HCP HEALTHY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Rochester Area Foundation · United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties · United Way of Southeast Minnesota · Winona Community Foundation · Medica Foundation · Mayo Clinic · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southeastern Minnesota Area Agency on Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southeastern Minnesota Area Agency on Aging Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Southeastern Minnesota Area Agency on Aging Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph