· Public charity
United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties
To improve peoples lives by connecting the caring power of our communities.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of UNITED WAY OF GOODHUEWABASHA & PIERCE COUNTIES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $130,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $150,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE COALITION -HOUSING SUPPORT KIDS COUNT COMM CARE FUND | $20,750 |
| RED WING YOUTH OUTREACH | $19,000 |
| HISPANIC OUTREACH | $17,500 |
| CARE CLINIC | $12,500 |
| COMMONBOND | $10,000 |
| THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY INC | $9,000 |
| COLVILL KIDS PRESCHOOL | $9,000 |
| WABASHA-KELLOGG PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $7,000 |
| HIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH | $6,500 |
| SEMCAC | $6,500 |
| HOPE & HARBOR SHELTER | $6,250 |
| RISE UP RED WING | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHOPE COALITION9× · 2017–2025 · $487k · revenue +29%
- RPRISEUP PARTNERSHIP9× · 2017–2025 · $276k · revenue +304%
- CAC A R E Clinic9× · 2017–2025 · $223k · revenue +500%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2023 · $60k
- FFFERNBROOK FARMS2× · 2021–2023 · $18k
- I2ISD 256one grant, 2017 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mental health resources is to foster hope, health and recovery for people affected by mental illness and substance use disorder.
To promote and protect the rights of people with disabilities and their families while supporting inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetime.
Darts creates connections that enrich aging. since 1974, darts has collaborated with diverse community partners to deliver services empowering older adults and caregivers, promote wellness, bolster financial stability, and foster ongoing…
Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…
We advance innovation, technology, and entrereneurs by bringing together like-minded individuals to create a thriving community. we provide resources, networks, and needed expertise for students, startups, and businesses to succeed.
Ucare will improve the health of our members through innovative services and partnerships across communities.
Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence.
Rural minnesota cep inc.'s (rmcep) mission is to provide exemplary workforce development services to our communities and exceed the expectations of our stakeholders. the vision of the organization is to inspire positive change leading to…
To be a community in which all youth, without regard to their living situation, have an equal opportunity to pursue and achieve their goals and dreams. the agency does this by supporting, resourcing, and empowering young people on their…
Working in partnership with the community to empower residents to improve their physical, social and economic well-being. we work to alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty.
To amplify the voices of those with lived experience, support adoptive, foster, and kinship families, educate child welfare professionals, and champion the well-being of children and families. whether you are seeking guidance or working to…
YWCA St. Paul's mission is to eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Three Rivers Community Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Artreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE COALITION ↗
- Who funds RISEUP PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds C A R E Clinic ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds RED WING FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION IN RED WING ↗
- Who funds PROACT INC ↗
- Who funds SEMCAC ↗
- Who funds HIAWATHA VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JESUS DRIVEN LLC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ARTREACH ↗
- Who funds SERVEMINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds Red Wing Arts Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Jones Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Red Wing Shoe Company Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation · Givinga Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Foundation · Albrecht-Poss Family Foundation · Southeastern Minnesota Area Agency on Aging Inc · United Way of Southeast Minnesota · Winona Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Goodhuewabasha & Pierce Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.