Skip to content
United Way of Davie County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Davie County Inc

The mission of the united way of davie county, inc.is to advance the common good of davie county by uniting the resources of the community to identify and address the most pressing human needs.

$21k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$102kHuman Services$97kYouth Development$43kFood & Nutrition$39kCrime & Legal$37kPhilanthropy$10kPublic Benefit$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$21,495
Median grant
—
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLOCATIONS 5000 AND UNDER$21,495
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CARES PROJECT: $20k → 11%DAVIE FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 11%FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 15%DAVIE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 11%THE CARES PROJECT: $8k → 11%DAVIE FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$425k · 10 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$425k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+16%

Still filing today

60%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CANCER SERVICES INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $54k · revenue +49%
  • TD
    THE DRAGONFLY HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $41k · revenue +24%
  • JH
    JUST HOPE INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $39k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • AU
    ALLOCATIONS UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • TF
    THE FARMINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +145%
  • OI
    OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dougherty County Casa Inc

Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…

Civil Rights
2
Darlington Community Foundation

The mission is to improve the quality of life for the disadvantaged and underserved youth and their families through education and advocacy, as well as to serve, provide and unite communities within and across the county of darlington as…

Philanthropy
3
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
4
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
5
United Way of Dane County Foundation Inc

The United Way of Dane County Foundation, Inc. exists to support the United Way of Dane County mission: to unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives. By providing a base of support, the Foundation helps United Way…

—
6
Children's Center of Surry Inc

The mission of the children's center of surry, inc. is dedicated to empowering children and families to foster resiliency through compassion, innovation, and collaborative support.

Crime & Legal
7
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
8
Iris Family Support Center Inc

Iris family support center, formerly known as scan, protects children, prepares parents, strengthens families and educates our community to stop child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
9
Depaul Community Resources

Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…

—
10
Durham's Partnership for Children

To ensure every child in durham enters school ready to succeed, we lead community strategies for children birth to 5, and their families that promote healthy development and learning and echance access to high quality care.

Education
11
Family Lifeline

Family lifeline partners with families and individuals, delivering intensive home and community-based services to achieve an equitable, resilient community where families and individuals are connected, safe, and living a healthy,…

Human Services
12
Forsyth County Family Haven Inc

To provide comprehensive services to individuals and their children who have experienced family violence, to educate and train the community on the issue of family violence/sexual assault, to increase self-sufficiency and to reduce…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cares Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Farmington Community Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLOCATIONS 5000 AND UNDER: $106,935 · OtherALLOCATIONS 5000 AND UNDERBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SERVICES INC: $36,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SERVICES INCDAVIE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $34,250 · OtherDAVIE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $30,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYALLOCATIONS UNDER 5000: $27,457 · OtherALLOCATIONS UNDER 5000DAVIE COUNTY RECREATION & PARKS: $23,644 · OtherDAVIE COUNTY RECREATION & PARKS+1 more: $6,000 · OtherCANCER SERVICES INC: $54,377 · HealthCANCER SERVICES INCTHE DRAGONFLY HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $41,220 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY HOUSE C…Young Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626): $31,747 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Chr…THE CARES PROJECT INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARES PROJE…FAMILY SERVICES INC: $7,070 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES…JUST HOPE INC: $38,713 · Food & NutritionDAVIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FARMINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOC: $9,500 · Recreation & SportsOUTREACH INC: $9,000 · International
Other$264,786Health$95,597Human Services$66,817Food & Nutrition$38,713Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$9,500International$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER SERVICES INC: $54,377 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $41,220 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJUST HOPE INC: $38,713 over 3y, 11% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SERVICES INC: $36,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626): $31,747 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARES PROJECT INC: $28,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetDAVIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FARMINGTON COMMUNITY ASSOC: $9,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetOUTREACH INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $7,070 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Davie Community Found…Reynolds American Fou…Forsyth Memorial Hosp…Margaret C Woodson Fo…The Winston-Salem Fou…Duke Energy FoundationThe Cannon Foundation…Foundation for the Ca…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…
Davie Community Foundation IncNC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Davie Community Foundation Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Margaret C Woodson Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Davie County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Davie County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Davie County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home