Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Service Association for Health Care Foundation

To increase public education and knowledge of issues in health care.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$285kHuman Services$204kPhilanthropy$193kRecreation & Sports$65kArts & Culture$49kYouth Development$16kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$10kReligion$10kOther$142k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $52,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $54,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARLINGTON MUSEUM OF ART$35,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON ATHLETICS$10,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 8%COMMUMITY AND FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION: $23k → 11%THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION: $23k → 11%PAT GREEN FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IA
OH
CA
KS
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$907k · 13 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against +70% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$907k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+70%

Still filing today

85%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BEN HOGAN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $193k · revenue +6%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $145k · revenue +145%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SE
    SOUTHWESTERN EXPOSITION AND LIVESTOCK SHOWgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +70%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +106%
  • AL
    ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
3
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
4
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
5
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
6
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
7
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

11
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ach Child and Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Arlington Museum of Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesChild and Family ServicesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr16%9%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr10%23%35–55yr13%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr10%16%35–55yr13%53%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,777

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $145,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP…Cook Children's Medical Center — $75,000 · HealthCook Children's Medical CenterBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $15,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $125,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red C…THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION — $57,500 · Human ServicesTHE PAT GREEN FOUNDATIO…CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesCUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FA…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE BEN HOGAN FOUNDATION — $192,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BEN HOGAN FOUNDATI…UNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON — $110,000 · OtherUNIV OF TEXAS AT ARL…THE SALVATION ARMY — $20,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $7,500 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN EXPOSITION AND LIVESTOCK SHOW — $15,227 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN EXPOSIT…ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER — $10,000 · OtherARLINGTON LIFE SHELT…KINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEK — $10,000 · OtherKINGDOM CAUSES INC C…+4 more — $4,500 · OtherFriends of the Levitt Pavilion - Arlington — $65,000 · Recreation & SportsArlington Museum of Art Inc — $41,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE ARLINGTON INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $16,231 · Youth Development
Health$285,000Human Services$203,500Philanthropy$192,500Other$177,227Recreation & Sports$65,000Arts & Culture$48,500Youth Development$16,231

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BEN HOGAN FOUNDATION — $192,500 over 5y, 17% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $145,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Levitt Pavilion - Arlington — $65,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION — $57,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetArlington Museum of Art Inc — $41,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $16,231 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN EXPOSITION AND LIVESTOCK SHOW — $15,227 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUZMAN 23 FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHEATRE ARLINGTON INC — $2,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL ON AGING — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY & FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bnsf Railway FoundationTX16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bnsf Railway Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Service Association for Health Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph