Skip to content

· Public charity

Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc

UUSC advances human rights and social justice around the world, partnering with those who confront unjust power structures and mobilizing to challenge oppressive policies.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$1.6MEnvironment$662kPublic Safety & Disaster$605kInternational$521kCrime & Legal$495kHuman Services$416kReligion$221kEmployment$176kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $866,640, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,229,501 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,362,861 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k21 grants · $449k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $418k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Parish in Malden$106,000
Faith in Democracy$88,640
Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights$60,000
United States Campaign for Burma$58,000
Lowlander Center Inc$55,000
School of the Americas Watch Educational Fund$50,000
UndocuBlack Network Inc$40,000
Unitarian Universalist Justice Ministry of North Carolina$39,000
Central American Resource Center$30,000
Earthrights International Inc$30,000
Center for Transformative Action$30,000
Asylum Pride House$30,000
Grassroots International$25,000
Center for Disaster Philanthropy Inc$25,000
Peace Development Fund$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $938k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Al Otro Lado Inc: $25k → 11%Central American Resource Center: $30k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%UU Ministry for Earth: $25k → 12%Alaska Institute for Justice: $130k → 10%Latino Union: $25k → 14%Cooperation Jackson of Mississippi Inc: $20k → 23%CHIN Community of USA INC DC Area: $14k → 8%Central American Resources Center of California: $20k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%UU Ministry for Earth: $10k → 12%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $60k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $57k → 10%CHIN Community of USA INC DC Area: $6k → 8%Al Otro Lado Inc: $6k → 11%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $55k → 10%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $44k → 10%Louisiana Appleseed: $20k → 23%Haitian Bridge Alliance: $20k → 11%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $42k → 10%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $15k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $25k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $25k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.0M · 45% · 31 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Central America and the Caribbean$664k · 28% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$429k · 18% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

North America (Canada and Mexico)$199k · 9% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 55 repeat orgs$901k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
30

Total granted

$4.3M
$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+43%

Still filing today

78%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $424k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalCrime & LegalReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Alaska Institute For Justice
    7× · 2017–2023 · $378k · revenue +60%
  • LC
    LOWLANDER CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $372k · revenue +181% · 31% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • SE
    Skylight Engagement Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -58%
  • LU
    Latino Union of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
2
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
3
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
4
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
5
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
6
Civil Liberties Defense Center

CIVIL LIBERTIES DEFENSE CENTER (CLDC) educates the general public about their rights and privileges under the US Constitution and provides free legal support to climate and social justice activists.

Civil Rights
7
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
8
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
9
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
10
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
11
Alianza Americas

The mission of Alianza Americas is to bring about a more inclusive, equitable and sustainable way of life for Latino immigrant communities living in the United States and across the americas. By working transnationally with partners from…

International
12
Jubilee Immigration Advocates

Our mission is to reflect Gods intent for humanity, to live as a reconciled and and restored community. We stand in solidarity with immigrants by providing high quality, affordable immigration legal services and advocating for just…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Undocublack Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/81
Grantees still filing
52/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION: $274,000 · OtherCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTIONUNITED STATES CAMPAIGN FOR BURMA: $263,000 · OtherUNITED STATES CAMPAIGN FOR BURMAUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION: $123,128 · OtherFIRST CHURCH IN MALDEN HOMES INC: $106,000 · OtherGRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP INC: $95,625 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCH OF TUCSON: $83,500 · OtherRURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCE: $115,000 · OtherWest Street Recovery: $137,457 · OtherWest Street RecoveryCRISTOSAL INC: $100,000 · Other+42 more: $1,186,390 · Other+42 moreAlaska Institute For Justice: $377,585 · Human ServicesAlaska Institute For …GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA LATINO ALLIAN…FOUNDATION FOR THE AUSTIN SANCTUARY NETWORK: $115,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR THE AU…Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $110,000 · Human ServicesCentral American Reso…ARAB AMERICAN CIVIC COUNCIL: $45,000 · Human ServicesUnitarian Universalist Ministry for Earth: $34,933 · Human Services+7 more: $165,656 · Human Services+7 moreUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC: $97,000 · Civil RightsUNDOCUBLACK N…Freedom for Immigrants: $84,500 · Civil RightsFreedom for I…Minnesota Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Alliance: $80,000 · Civil RightsMinnesota Uni…ACTIVATE LABS: $64,000 · Civil RightsACTIVATE LABSMUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE: $53,000 · Civil RightsMUSLIM JUSTIC…FE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER: $50,000 · Civil RightsFE Y JUSTICIA…CENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $48,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR LA…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $43,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMM…EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsSkylight Engagement Inc: $25,000 · Civil RightsFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc: $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $25,000 · Civil RightsLOWLANDER CENTER: $372,050 · Community ImprovementCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $22,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $15,250 · Community ImprovementGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $90,000 · InternationalFortify Inc: $70,000 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $40,000 · InternationalPeace Development Fund: $25,000 · InternationalCONVERSATIONS WITH FRIENDS: $25,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBAL: $20,000 · InternationalBORDERLINKS: $20,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY IN HAITI INC: $20,000 · International+2 more: $15,000 · InternationalUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE ARIZONA NETWORK: $100,780 · ReligionFAITH IN DEMOCRACY: $88,640 · ReligionUnitarian Universalist Justice Ministry of North Carolina: $39,000 · ReligionUnitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network Inc: $22,500 · ReligionCENTER FOR ETHICAL LIVING AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: $15,000 · ReligionTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $96,580 · HealthLiving Hope Wheelchair Association: $72,500 · HealthPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $32,000 · Health
Other$2,484,100Human Services$1,013,174Civil Rights$625,000Community Improvement$409,300International$325,000Religion$265,920Health$201,080

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlaska Institute For Justice: $377,585 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetLOWLANDER CENTER: $372,050 over 8y, 31% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION: $274,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $165,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetWest Street Recovery: $137,457 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE AUSTIN SANCTUARY NETWORK: $115,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetRURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCE: $115,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $110,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE ARIZONA NETWORK: $100,780 over 6y, 15% of budgetCRISTOSAL INC: $100,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC: $97,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $96,580 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP INC: $95,625 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH IN DEMOCRACY: $88,640 over 1y, 51% of budgetFreedom for Immigrants: $84,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMinnesota Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Alliance: $80,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetLiving Hope Wheelchair Association: $72,500 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetFortify Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetACTIVATE LABS: $64,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER: $61,460 over 3y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW STORIES: $60,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetMUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE: $53,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSchool of the Americas Watch Ed Fnd: $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetCENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC: $48,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $48,420 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK BELT JUSTICE CENTER: $47,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetARAB AMERICAN CIVIC COUNCIL: $45,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetJUSTICE IN MOTION INC: $45,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCARRIZO COMECRUDO NATION OF TEXAS INC: $44,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $43,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $42,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES AND FRIENDS OF LOUISIANAS INCARCERATED CHILDREN: $38,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMake the Road New York: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Ministry for Earth: $34,933 over 2y, 21% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $32,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAL OTRO LADO: $31,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF CALIFORNIA: $31,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetLOUISIANA ADVOCATES FOR IMMIGRANTS IN DETENTION: $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center: $30,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDGE FUNDERS ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetIMMIGRANT ACTION ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetSkylight Engagement Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC37.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Tides Center · Borealis Philanthropy · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · The Ford Foundation · Fwdus Education Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Unitarian Universalist Service Committee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph