· Public charity
Unfcu Foundation Inc
To reduce poverty through education, health care programs and livelihood training, especially among women and youth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $1,191,372 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,346,527 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $155,155 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $343k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $840k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| US ASSOCIATION FOR UNHCR | $118,026 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $100,000 |
| BUILDING TOMORROW INC | $90,000 |
| UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND | $90,000 |
| REFUSHE | $85,000 |
| THE FLOATING HOSPITAL | $82,000 |
| FRIENDS OF KONEXIO FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| MINDLEAPS | $50,000 |
| IMAGINE HER-IH | $50,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| TOGETHER WE BAKE | $50,000 |
| UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF | $48,290 |
| GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS | $40,000 |
| HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD | $35,000 |
| THE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INC | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 16% of Unfcu Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 49% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UFUSA FOR UNFPA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $531k · revenue +101%
- TFTHE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $489k · revenue +70%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC8× · 2018–2025 · $460k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- UIUBONGO INTERNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +929%
- GUGirl Up UN Foundationone grant, 2019 · $40k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Women in Progress dba Global Mamas works to achieve economic independence of African women and alleviate poverty at a grassroots level by creating jobs and income generation opportunities that generate a sustainable, living wage and at the…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Mothers Without Borders is dedicated to fostering resilience and self-sufficiency in developing countries through a holistic approach to community empowerment, particularly focusing on the most vulnerable women, youth, and children. Our…
Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
At Shift, we have one purpose: to transform how business gets done in order to ensure respect for peoples lives and dignity. We believe that the best way to advance our mission is by working directly with Businesses to help shape their…
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
Empower surivors through educational opportunities, mental health counseling, and micro-loans to create jobs and build a brighter future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanctuary for Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Khaled Hosseini Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds USA FOR UNFPA INC ↗
- Who funds THE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds Together We Bake ↗
- Who funds BUILDING TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds MINDLEAPS ↗
- Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds RefuSHE Inc ↗
- Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BATEY RELIEF ALLIANCE BRA ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE HER - IH ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KONEXIO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC ↗
- Who funds NYAKA INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds UBONGO INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE KHALED HOSSEINI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STREET CHILD US ↗
- Who funds BOTTOMLESS CLOSET ↗
- Who funds KEEP A CHILD ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE AFRIWOMEN NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Inable ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Segal Family Foundation Inc · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Kasperick Foundation · The Issroff Family Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Imago Dei Fund · Together Women Rise · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Unfcu Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Unfcu Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Unfcu Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.