Skip to content
Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 at a glance

· Private foundation

Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$878k
Granted FY2021
15
Grants FY2021
10
States reached
$428k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Boston Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $878k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’21
0
’22
0
’23
25
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.9MEnvironment$411kCommunity Improvement$350kPublic Benefit$160kScience & Tech$125kEducation$115kHealth$105kCivil Rights$100kOther$0
02FY2021 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k9 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $337k
  • $250k+1 grant · $428k
$9,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOROTHY JORDAN CHADWICK FUND$427,812
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$197,000
VOTE ORG$140,000
JACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE$30,000
MATERNITY CARE COALITION$15,000
COLOR OF CHANGE EDUCATION FUND$15,000
WILD SALMON CENTER$9,000
AMERICAN RIVERS INC$9,000
FRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE$7,000
AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB$6,000
PROLITERACY$5,000
BLUE HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY INC$5,000
EARTHJUSTICE$5,000
TREE OF LIFE$5,000
WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE INC: $3k → 8%WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE INC: $3k → 8%TREE OF LIFE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
MT
NY
MA
OR
WY
PA
CA
CO
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$877k · 25 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 18 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
45

Total granted

$877k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

28%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationCivil RightsHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WILD SALMON CENTER
    3× · 2021–2025 · $34k · revenue +115%
  • AMERICAN RIVERS INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +177%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB
    2× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • DJ
    DOROTHY JORDAN CHADWICK FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $428k
  • V
    VOTEORG
    one grant, 2021 · $140k · revenue -5%
  • NG
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $55k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
African Parks Foundation of America

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment…

Recreation & Sports
8
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
9
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
10
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center; the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
14/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOROTHY JORDAN CHADWICK FUND: $427,812 · OtherDOROTHY JORDAN CHADWICK FUNDCOMMUNITY FDN OF JACKSON HOLE: $350,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FDN OF JACKSON HOLE+51 more: $856,200 · Other+51 moreBoston Foundation Inc: $890,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation IncCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $546,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLEVOTEORG: $140,000 · Civil RightsCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND: $25,000 · Civil RightsADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $35,000 · EnvironmentJACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $30,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $28,000 · EnvironmentOutdoor Alliance: $15,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentFriends of Acadia: $5,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $5,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $55,000 · EducationPROCTOR ACADEMY: $50,000 · EducationBLUE HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 · EducationWILD SALMON CENTER: $34,000 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INC: $10,000 · AnimalsCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc: $45,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,634,012Philanthropy$1,436,000Civil Rights$165,000Environment$128,000Education$115,000Animals$74,000Youth Development$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $890,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $546,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $34,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaternity Care Coalition: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOutdoor Alliance: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOceanic Society Expeditions: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Acadia: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UPPER DELAWARE RIVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREE OF LIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
  • Who funds VOTEORG ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds City Kids to Wilderness Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Maternity Care Coalition ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgGs Donor Advised Phil…Seattle FoundationThe Wilderness SocietyCommunity Foundation …The New York Communit…Maine Community Found…Marin Community Found…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for Good
PatagoniaorgCA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Seattle Foundation · The Wilderness Society · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The New York Community Trust · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • National Marine Sanctuary Foundation: 88% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ud Dorothy J Chadwick 061157’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home