· Private foundation
Tyler Perry Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $356k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $775k
- $250k+2 grants · $850k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $500,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFF | $350,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FN | $200,000 |
| BABY2BABY | $200,000 |
| Kindnessorg | $100,000 |
| HOUSEPROUD ATLANTA | $100,000 |
| HOPE ATLANTA | $75,000 |
| SOUTH FULTON INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| MOVING IN THE SPIRIT | $40,000 |
| One Love Community | $40,000 |
| PRAYFIT MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| OPERATION WARM | $26,400 |
| ATLANTA DRUM ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| Harlem Stage | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KIKINDNESSORG INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +22% · 28% of their budget
- HAHOUSEPROUD ATLANTA INC2× · 2022–2024 · $200k · revenue +26%
- GMGLOBAL MEDICAL RELIEF FUND INC3× · 2020–2022 · $180k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- NINUMEROUS INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIESone grant, 2020 · $227k
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +22%- TATHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide assistance to under served children and their families in usa, africa and caribbeanto improve the quality of their lives and civic contribution through educational , housingand medical prgrams.
The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
Atlfamilymeal inc.'s mission is to feed, nourish and support hospitality workers and their families experiencing hunger and joblessness in the metro atlanta community.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.
Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is House of Artists Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT ↗
- Who funds KINDNESSORG INC ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds HOUSEPROUD ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MEDICAL RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds 14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FOR OTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds NEW IMAGE EMERGENCY SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds BEYOND BEDTIME INC ↗
- Who funds ONE LOVE COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds PRAYFIT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE MISSION CONTINUES ↗
- Who funds MOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC ↗
- Who funds ONESOURCE LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Humanity Plus Inc ↗
- Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
- Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FULTON INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF IMAGINE1DAY INC ↗
- Who funds Health Professionals Network for Tigray ↗
- Who funds TENDER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARLEM STAGE INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA YOUTH SOCCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · The Imlay Foundation Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · The Choate Foundation (Fka Choate Bridges Foundation) · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgiainc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tyler Perry Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tyler Perry Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Tyler Perry Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.